IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i24p7188-d1301601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remote Communications between Patients and General Practitioners: Do Patients Choose the Most Effective Communication Routes?

Author

Listed:
  • Ido Morag

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Shenkar College of Engineering and Design, Ramat-Gan 5252626, Israel)

  • Efrat Kedmi-Shahar

    (Ministry of Health—State of Patient Safety Division, Ministry of Health—State of Israel, 39 Yirmiyahu St., P.O. Box 1176, Jerusalem 9446724, Israel)

  • Dana Arad

    (Clalit Health Services, Innovation Division, 40 Toval St., Ramat Gan 5252247, Israel)

Abstract

The use of remote communication between patients and general practitioners has greatly increased worldwide, especially following the COVID-19 outbreak. Yet, it is important to evaluate the impact of this shift on healthcare quality. This study aimed at evaluating remote healthcare quality by comparing four remote patient-to-physician communication modes used in Israel. The research methodology entailed criteria-based analysis conducted by healthcare quality experts and a subjective patient-perception questionnaire regarding the healthcare quality attributed to each mode and the extent to which each mode was used. Our findings indicate that the extent to which each mode is used was found to be inversely related to its rated quality. As such, the common assumption whereby patients tend to choose the mode of communication that will most likely ensure high service quality is refuted. Our findings also indicate that remote services often hinder the physician’s understanding of the patient’s clinical issues, as patients encounter difficulties in correctly articulating and conveying them; such services also hinder the patient’s understanding of the recommended course of treatment. These findings should be addressed by policymakers for improving remote communication services to ensure optimal healthcare service quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ido Morag & Efrat Kedmi-Shahar & Dana Arad, 2023. "Remote Communications between Patients and General Practitioners: Do Patients Choose the Most Effective Communication Routes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:24:p:7188-:d:1301601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/24/7188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/24/7188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Baudier & Galina Kondrateva & Chantal Ammi & Victor Chang & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Patients’ perceptions of teleconsultation during COVID-19: a cross-national study," Post-Print hal-03052149, HAL.
    2. Baudier, Patricia & Kondrateva, Galina & Ammi, Chantal & Chang, Victor & Schiavone, Francesco, 2021. "Patients’ perceptions of teleconsultation during COVID-19: A cross-national study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Yusuf Sheikh & Ayesha Ali & Aya Khasati & Alan Hasanic & Urvi Bihani & Raja Ohri & Keerthi Muthukumar & James Barlow, 2023. "Benefits and Challenges of Video Consulting for Mental Health Diagnosis and Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study in Community Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Claire Norman & Josephine M. Wildman & Sarah Sowden, 2021. "COVID-19 at the Deep End: A Qualitative Interview Study of Primary Care Staff Working in the Most Deprived Areas of England during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Lukas Degen & Karen Linden & Tanja Seifried-Dübon & Brigitte Werners & Matthias Grot & Esther Rind & Claudia Pieper & Anna-Lisa Eilerts & Verena Schroeder & Stefanie Kasten & Manuela Schmidt & Julian , 2021. "Job Satisfaction and Chronic Stress of General Practitioners and Their Teams: Baseline Data of a Cluster-Randomised Trial (IMPROVE job )," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Chunjia & Yang, Mu & Piterou, Athena, 2021. "Do news media and citizens have the same agenda on COVID-19? an empirical comparison of twitter posts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Ruhul Amin & Abdullah Al Masud & Md. Imran Hossain & Mohammad Awal Hossen & Mohammad Kamal Hossain, 2023. "What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    3. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Donvito, Raffaele, 2023. "Pharmacists' attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Chauhan, Ankur & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta, 2022. "Implications for sustainable healthcare operations in embracing telemedicine services during a pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Prabh Deep Singh & Rajbir Kaur & Kiran Deep Singh & Gaurav Dhiman, 2021. "A Novel Ensemble-based Classifier for Detecting the COVID-19 Disease for Infected Patients," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1385-1401, December.
    6. Frishammar, Johan & Essén, Anna & Bergström, Frida & Ekman, Tilda, 2023. "Digital health platforms for the elderly? Key adoption and usage barriers and ways to address them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zamani, Mehdi & Daim, Tugrul U. & Sharma, Mahak & Yalcin, Haydar, 2022. "Conceptual structure and perspectives on “innovation management”: A bibliometric review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Omrani, Nessrine & Rivieccio, Giorgia & Fiore, Ugo & Schiavone, Francesco & Agreda, Sergio Garcia, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? An assessment of trust in AI-based systems: Concerns, ethics and contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Eka Pramudita & Hendra Achmadi & Hansa Nurhaida, 2023. "Determinants of behavioral intention toward telemedicine services among Indonesian Gen-Z and Millenials: a PLS–SEM study on Alodokter application," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Capponi, Giovanna & Corrocher, Nicoletta, 2022. "Patterns of collaboration in mHealth: A network analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Amber Sacre & Clare Bambra & Josephine M. Wildman & Katie Thomson & Sarah Sowden & Adam Todd, 2022. "Socioeconomic Inequalities and Vaccine Uptake: An Umbrella Review Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Anke Wagner & Brigitte Werners & Claudia Pieper & Anna-Lisa Eilerts & Tanja Seifried-Dübon & Matthias Grot & Florian Junne & Birgitta M. Weltermann & Monika A. Rieger & Esther Rind, 2023. "Exploring Transfer Potentials of the IMPROVE job Intervention for Strengthening Workplace Health Management in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Germany: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Kristin Lork & Kristina Holmgren & Jenny Hultqvist, 2021. "Does the Number of Reasons for Seeking Care and Self-Rated Health Predict Sick Leave during the Following 12 Months? A Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Swedish Primary Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Julian Göbel & Manuela Schmidt & Tanja Seifried-Dübon & Karen Linden & Lukas Degen & Esther Rind & Anna-Lisa Eilerts & Claudia Pieper & Matthias Grot & Brigitte Werners & Verena Schröder & Karl-Heinz , 2022. "Higher Work-Privacy Conflict and Lower Job Satisfaction in GP Leaders and Practice Assistants Working Full-Time Compared to Part-Time: Results of the IMPROVE job Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:24:p:7188-:d:1301601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.