IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i13p6322-d1189407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Brief Coparenting Measure: The Coparenting Competence Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Chris May

    (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Codie Atherton

    (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Kim Colyvas

    (College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Vincent Mancini

    (Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Linda E. Campbell

    (School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

Abstract

Coparenting competence (CC) is a concept that describes the sense of collective efficacy that parents experience in raising children. An advantage of CC is that it bridges a gap between family systems thinking and efficacy theory, where extant research and theory have focused on the self-efficacy of one or both parents. This study aimed to develop a self-reported measure of CC. Methodology: Participants ( n = 302), including cohabiting mothers ( n = 240) and fathers ( n = 62), completed an online survey (112 items) comprising demographic questions, the Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS), the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and 36 items designed to explore perceptions of CC. Results: Factor analyses on 36-CC items identified 10 items that reliably formed a brief Coparenting Competence Scale (CCS; Alpha = 0.89). Analysis of convergent and divergent validity demonstrated that the CCS measures a unique construct that is linked to parenting self-efficacy, measured by PSOC ( r = 0.47), and coparenting quality, assessed by the CRS ( r = 0.63). There was a significant association between CCS and SDQ across age groups and an association stronger than that found for the CRS and SDQ in the current cohort. Conclusions and Implications: The study found support for the reliability and validity of the CCS. Coparenting competence, assessed by the CCS, was found to be distinct from factors previously used to represent coparenting quality in multivariate scales. The strength of associations between the CCS and SDQ suggests this new measure may have an important role in coparenting research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris May & Codie Atherton & Kim Colyvas & Vincent Mancini & Linda E. Campbell, 2023. "Development of a Brief Coparenting Measure: The Coparenting Competence Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6322-:d:1189407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6322/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6322/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fengqing Zhao & Haomeng Wu & Yixuan Li & Huifang Zhang & Jie Hou, 2022. "The Association between Coparenting Behavior and Internalizing/Externalizing Problems of Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6322-:d:1189407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.