IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p782-d1021711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a Needs-Oriented Psychological Intervention for Chinese Women Undergoing an Abortion

Author

Listed:
  • Na Wang

    (School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100069, China
    School of Nursing and Midwifery, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia)

  • Debra K. Creedy

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Logan Campus, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Brisbane, QLD 4131, Australia)

  • Mingna Zhang

    (School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100069, China)

  • Hong Lu

    (School of Nursing, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Elizabeth Elder

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia)

  • Jyai Allen

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Logan Campus, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Brisbane, QLD 4131, Australia)

  • Li Guo

    (School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100069, China)

  • Qian Xiao

    (School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10 Xitoutiao Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100069, China)

  • Jenny Gamble

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Logan Campus, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Brisbane, QLD 4131, Australia)

Abstract

Accessing good quality abortion care is a fundamental human right and contributes to achieving Sustainable Development Goals. However, well-designed abortion care that meets women’s needs is limited. This study aims to systematically develop an intervention to promote the psychological well-being of Chinese women undergoing an abortion. A five-step iterative approach informed by intervention mapping was undertaken to determine the intervention design. Step 1 used in-depth interviews with 14 Chinese women undergoing an abortion to assess real-life stressors and support needs. We identified eight stressors and found women’s support needs varied with the time trajectory of the abortion. Step 2 used a focus group discussion with care providers to select modifiable stressors that impact negative psychological outcomes. In Step 3 and Step 4, we determined and integrated the exact strategies to eliminate or mitigate possible modifiable stressors by incorporating information from in-depth interviews and the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. The integrated strategies were instructional support, informational support, and timely communication. In Step 5, we composed the detailed intervention design according to the best available evidence and, to confirm content validity, consulted 10 women who had undergone abortion in the previous 2–6 weeks. The intervention was titled STress-And-coping suppoRT (START), which included four interacting components: (1) a face-to-face consultation at the first appointment; (2) a printed booklet with information on abortion, self-care, and managing emotions and intimate relationships; (3) a WeChat-based online public profile page offering the same information as the booklet; (4) a telephone hotline. This study paves the way for a new approach to addressing the psychological needs of women experiencing abortion in China. The rigorous process provides an example of developing tailored health promotion interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Wang & Debra K. Creedy & Mingna Zhang & Hong Lu & Elizabeth Elder & Jyai Allen & Li Guo & Qian Xiao & Jenny Gamble, 2022. "Designing a Needs-Oriented Psychological Intervention for Chinese Women Undergoing an Abortion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:782-:d:1021711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing Wang & Junqing Wu & Yuyan Li & Ying Zhou & Yiran Li & Rui Zhao & Qi Tong & Mingzhong Luo, 2019. "Changes in the Prevalence of Induced Abortion in the Floating Population in Major Cities of China 2007–2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Foster, D.G. & Biggs, M.A. & Ralph, L. & Gerdts, C. & Roberts, S. & Glymour, M.M., 2018. "Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(3), pages 407-413.
    3. Pallitto, Christina C. & O'Campo, Patricia, 2005. "Community level effects of gender inequality on intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy in Colombia: testing the feminist perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 2205-2216, May.
    4. Jessica Gurevitch & Julia Koricheva & Shinichi Nakagawa & Gavin Stewart, 2018. "Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7695), pages 175-182, March.
    5. Na Wang & Jyai Allen & Jenny Gamble & Debra K. Creedy, 2020. "Nonpharmacological interventions to improve the psychological well‐being of women accessing abortion services and their satisfaction with care: A systematic review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 854-867, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    2. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Caterina Muratori, 2021. "The Impact of Abortion Access on Violence Against Women," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    4. Irsova, Zuzana & Doucouliagos, Hristos & Havranek, Tomas & Stanley, T. D., 2023. "Meta-Analysis of Social Science Research: A Practitioner’s Guide," EconStor Preprints 273719, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Alexander L. Brown & Taisuke Imai & Ferdinand M. Vieider & Colin F. Camerer, 2024. "Meta-analysis of Empirical Estimates of Loss Aversion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 485-516, June.
    6. Marisa Bucheli & Máximo Rossi, 2016. "Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Latin America," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0116, Department of Economics - dECON.
    7. Ruhaimatu Abudu & Raj Bridgelall, 2024. "Autonomous Ships: A Thematic Review," World, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Lukas Hafner & Maxime Pichon & Christophe Burucoa & Sophie H. A. Nusser & Alexandra Moura & Marc Garcia-Garcera & Marc Lecuit, 2021. "Listeria monocytogenes faecal carriage is common and depends on the gut microbiota," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Kulinskaya, Elena & Mah, Eung Yaw, 2021. "Simulation results on the performance of statistical methods in cumulative meta analysis," MetaArXiv 8t4pf, Center for Open Science.
    10. Kyoko Shimamoto & Jessica D Gipson, 2019. "Investigating pathways linking women’s status and empowerment to skilled attendance at birth in Tanzania: A structural equation modeling approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Christopher Hansen & Holger Steinmetz & Jörn Block, 2022. "How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Denis Fougère & Arthur Heim, 2019. "L'évaluation socioéconomique de l'investissement social," Working Papers hal-03456048, HAL.
    13. Sarah C M Roberts & Nancy F Berglas & Katrina Kimport, 2020. "Complex situations: Economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider – but do not have – abortions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. In-Soo Shin & Juh-Hyun Shin & Dong-Eun Jang & Jiyeon Lee, 2022. "A Methodological Quality Evaluation of Meta-Analyses on Nursing Home Research: Overview and Suggestions for Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Fabio De Felice & Ilaria Baffo & Antonella Petrillo, 2022. "Critical Infrastructures Overview: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Subroy, Vandana & Gunawardena, Asha & Polyakov, Maksym & Pandit, Ram & Pannell, David J., 2019. "The worth of wildlife: A meta-analysis of global non-market values of threatened species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Polina Zvavitch & Michael S. Rendall & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Rachel M. Shattuck, 2021. "Contraceptive Consistency and Poverty After Birth," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(6), pages 1277-1311, December.
    18. Wenqiang Xie & Xiaodong Yan, 2023. "Responses of Wheat Protein Content and Protein Yield to Future Climate Change in China during 2041–2060," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Antonino Malacrinò & Victoria A Sadowski & Tvisha K Martin & Nathalia Cavichiolli de Oliveira & Ian J Brackett & James D Feller & Kristian J Harris & Orlando Combita Heredia & Rosa Vescio & Alison E B, 2020. "Biological invasions alter environmental microbiomes: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Verónica Amarante & Martín Brun & Cecilia Rossel, 2020. "Poverty and inequality in Latin America’s research agenda: A bibliometric review," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(4), pages 465-482, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:782-:d:1021711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.