IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p575-d1019060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association between Replacement Drivers and Depressive Symptoms

Author

Listed:
  • Jongmin Lee

    (Department of Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Heejoo Park

    (Department of Business Administration and Data Science, CHA University, 120 Haeryong-ro, Donggyo-dong, Pocheon-si 11160, Republic of Korea)

  • Juyeon Oh

    (Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Juho Sim

    (Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Chorom Lee

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Yangwook Kim

    (Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Byungyoon Yun

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

  • Jin-Ha Yoon

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
    The Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

A replacement driver is a type of gig worker who provides driving services to the target point with the drunk driver’s own car. This study aimed to examine the association of replacement drivers (ref: paid workers) with depressive symptoms. Information on replacement drivers was collected through online/offline surveys. Data from the 8th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were applied to construct the control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9; ≥5 points was defined as depressive symptoms. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by performing multivariable logistic regression analysis. The mean age of replacement drivers was 56.11. The prevalence of depressive symptoms in replacement drivers and controls were 49.63% and 12.64%, respectively. Replacement drivers showed a higher association with depressive symptoms than paid workers (aOR 7.89, 95% CI [5.53–11.26]). This relationship was prominent in the older, low-education, and low-income groups. Linear discriminant analysis was the most effective in predicting depressive symptoms among the machine learning models. Using the replacement driver feature increased the AUC values of the models. Given the strong association between depressive symptoms and replacement drivers, in-depth studies to establish guidelines to prevent mental diseases among replacement drivers are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Jongmin Lee & Heejoo Park & Juyeon Oh & Juho Sim & Chorom Lee & Yangwook Kim & Byungyoon Yun & Jin-Ha Yoon, 2022. "The Association between Replacement Drivers and Depressive Symptoms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:575-:d:1019060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander M. Crizzle & Maeve McLean & Jennifer Malkin, 2020. "Risk Factors for Depressive Symptoms in Long-Haul Truck Drivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Sundararajan, Arun, 2016. "The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262034573, April.
    3. Wayne Lewchuk, 2017. "Precarious jobs: Where are they, and how do they affect well-being?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 402-419, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Stewart & Jim Stanford, 2017. "Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 420-437, September.
    2. Andrey SHEVCHUK & Denis STREBKOV, 2023. "Digital platforms and the changing freelance workforce in the Russian Federation: A ten‐year perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Petra Ritzer-Angerer, 2021. "Sharing Economy trifft ÖPNV — das neue Personenbeförderungsgesetz [Sharing Economy Meets Public Transport — The New Passenger Transport Act]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(10), pages 789-794, October.
    4. Pia Szichta & Ingela Tietze, 2020. "Sharing Economy in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft: Treiber und Hemmnisse [Title sharing economy in the electricity sector: drivers and barriers]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 109-125, December.
    5. Laia Ollé-Espluga & Johanna Muckenhuber & Markus Hadler, 2021. "The ‘economy for the common good’, job quality and workers’ well-being in Austria and Germany," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 3-21, March.
    6. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    7. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam, 2022. "In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 349-358, June.
    8. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Relationships between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Context of Their Perception by Final Purchasers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Vincenzo Vignieri, 2021. "Crowdsourcing as a mode of open innovation: Exploring drivers of success of a multisided platform through system dynamics modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 108-124, January.
    10. Rajeev Kumar, 2022. "A Gig Worker-Centric Approach for Efficient Picking and Delivery of Electric Scooters," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.
    12. Saif Benjaafar & Daniel Jiang & Xiang Li & Xiaobo Li, 2022. "Dynamic Inventory Repositioning in On-Demand Rental Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7861-7878, November.
    13. Agam Gupta & Biswatosh Saha & Parthasarathi Banerjee, 2018. "Pricing decisions of car aggregation platforms in sharing economy: a developing economy perspective," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(5), pages 341-355, October.
    14. Julienne Brabet & Corinne Vercher- Chaptal & Lucy Taska, 2020. "From oligopolistic digital platforms to Open/Cooperative Ones?," Post-Print hal-03201454, HAL.
    15. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian, 2020. "Digital Disruption beyond Uber and Airbnb—Tracking the long tail of the sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Sonny Rosenthal & Jean Yi Colette Tan & Ting Fang Poh, 2020. "Reputation Cues as Signals in the Sharing Economy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    17. G. Debucquet & P. Guillotreau & G. Lazuech & F. Salladarré & J. Troiville, 2020. "Sense of belonging and commitment to a community-supported fishery. The case of Yeu Island, France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 439-459, December.
    18. Bergh, Andreas & Funcke, Alexander & Wernberg, Joakim, 2021. "The Sharing Economy: Definition, Measurement and its Relationship to Capitalism," Working Paper Series 1380, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    19. Cristina Alaimo & Jannis Kallinikos, 2017. "Computing the everyday: social media as data platforms," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 81432, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:575-:d:1019060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.