IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5683-d810198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Heterogeneity and Attribution Analysis of Urban Thermal Comfort in China from 2000 to 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Jiansheng Wu

    (Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China
    Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Xuechen Li

    (Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Si Li

    (Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Chang Liu

    (Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Tengyun Yi

    (Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yuhao Zhao

    (Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China
    Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

Research on urban thermal environments based on thermal comfort can help formulate effective measures to improve urban thermal and human settlement environments, which is of great significance for improving urban quality, urban climate change adaptation, and sustainable development. Taking 344 municipal administrative districts in China as study areas, the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) of each city in the last 20 years was calculated to evaluate thermal comfort. We then analyzed the thermal comfort and spatiotemporal heterogeneity of each city during a typical heat wave. Finally, the driving forces of the potential socioeconomic, natural, and landscape factors influencing thermal comfort were analyzed using geographic detectors. The results show that the thermal comfort index had similar spatial patterns and differentiation characteristics in different years, and the interannual variation was not obvious. Cities in the typical heat wave period were mainly distributed in East and Northwest China. The driving factor in the contribution rate of the same index in different years was basically the same and was not affected by the change in years, and the highest contribution rate was the natural factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiansheng Wu & Xuechen Li & Si Li & Chang Liu & Tengyun Yi & Yuhao Zhao, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Attribution Analysis of Urban Thermal Comfort in China from 2000 to 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5683-:d:810198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Chao & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Xinhai & Han, Jing, 2021. "Trade-offs and driving forces of land use functions in ecologically fragile areas of northern Hebei Province: Spatiotemporal analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Tong Wu & Lucang Wang & Haiyang Liu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Land Surface Thermal Landscape in Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Bumseok Chun & Misun Hur & Jaewoong Won, 2021. "Impacts of Thermal Environments on Health Risk: A Case Study of Harris County, Texas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Lin-Yu Xu & Hao Yin & Xiao-Dong Xie, 2014. "Health Risk Assessment of Inhalable Particulate Matter in Beijing Based on the Thermal Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Xuan Ma & Mengying Wang & Jingyuan Zhao & Lei Zhang & Wanrong Liu, 2020. "Performance of Different Urban Design Parameters in Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Health in a Pedestrianized Zone," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Han Li & Wei Song, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Ecosystem Vulnerability on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Ling Cheng & Haiyang Cui & Tian Liang & Dan Huang & Yuanxia Su & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Study on the Trade-Off Synergy Relationship of “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions in Chinese Counties: A Case Study of Chongqing Municipality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Guilhardo Barros Moreira de Carvalho & Luiz Bueno da Silva, 2024. "The microclimate implications of urban form applying computer simulation: systematic literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 24687-24726, October.
    5. Chenying Li & Tiantian Zhang & Xi Wang & Zefeng Lian, 2022. "Site Selection of Urban Parks Based on Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP): A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Hao Yin & Linyu Xu & Yanpeng Cai, 2015. "Monetary Valuation of PM 10 -Related Health Risks in Beijing China: The Necessity for PM 10 Pollution Indemnity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Xiaofen Zhang & Zibibula Simayi & Shengtian Yang & Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Fang Shen & Yunyi Zhang, 2023. "Vulnerability Assessment of Ecological–Economic–Social Systems in Urban Agglomerations in Arid Regions—A Case Study of Urumqi–Changji–Shihezi Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Rumeng Yin & Xin Li & Bin Fang, 2023. "The Relationship between the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Land Use Function and the Level of Economic and Social Development in the Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Jiaqi Zhang & Hui Yong & Ning Lv, 2024. "Balancing Productivity and Sustainability: Insights into Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Arid Region of Northwest China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13828-13856, September.
    11. Hanlong Gu & Chongyang Huan & Fengjiao Yang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecological Vulnerability and Its Influencing Factors in Shenyang City of China: Based on SRP Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Shuang Lu & Zibo Zhou & Mingyang Houding & Liu Yang & Qiang Gao & Chenglong Cao & Xiang Li & Ziqiang Bu, 2023. "Study into the Evolution of Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces on the Indochina Peninsula," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Shi-Ying Li & Zhu Chen & Lian-Huan Guo & Fangbing Hu & Yi-Jun Huang & Dan-Cheng Wu & Zhigang Wu & Xin-Chen Hong, 2023. "How Do Spatial Forms Influence Psychophysical Drivers in a Campus City Community Life Circle?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Guoliang Xu & Xiaonan Yin & Guangdong Wu & Ning Gao, 2022. "Rethinking the Contribution of Land Element to Urban Economic Growth: Evidence from 30 Provinces in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Guoming Du & Xiaoyang Wang & Jieyong Wang & Yaqun Liu & Haonan Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatial–Temporal Pattern of the Newly Increased Cultivated Land and Its Vulnerability in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Meizi You & Riwen Lai & Jiayuan Lin & Zhesheng Zhu, 2021. "Quantitative Analysis of a Spatial Distribution and Driving Factors of the Urban Heat Island Effect: A Case Study of Fuzhou Central Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Rongxi Peng & Tao Liu & Guangzhong Cao, 2023. "Valuating Multifunctionality of Land Use for Sustainable Development: Framework, Method, and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Cuicui Ji & Hengcong Yang & Xiangjun Pei & Xiaochao Zhang & Lichuan Chen & Dan Liang & Yiming Cao & Jianping Pan & Maolin Chen, 2024. "Dynamic Integrated Ecological Assessment along the Corridor of the Sichuan–Tibet Railway," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Weisong Li & Wanxu Chen & Jiaojiao Bian & Jun Xian & Li Zhan, 2022. "Impact of Urbanization on Ecosystem Services Balance in the Han River Ecological Economic Belt, China: A Multi-Scale Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Guangliang Zhou & Di Zhang & Qian Zhou & Tao Shi, 2022. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of the “Production–Living–Ecology” Space in the Yellow River Basin and Its Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5683-:d:810198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.