IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5439-d805614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation: Intravenous Injection Training System

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Sun Lee

    (Department of Nursing, Honam University, Gwangju 62399, Korea)

Abstract

In nursing education, virtual reality simulation (VRS) is recognized as an effective learning method as it overcomes limitations in practical training and positively influences learning ability and satisfaction levels. The purpose of this study was to develop VRS for intravenous (IV) injection and investigate how it affects nursing students’ academic knowledge, performance confidence, and clinical practice competencies. A quasi-experimental control group pretest and post-test design was used. Participants were nursing students who either received a training system for an IV injection through VRS (experimental group; n = 20) or who received an IV arm simulator (control group; n = 20). The results revealed significantly higher knowledge (U = 156.5, p = 0.024) and clinical performance competency (U = 87.5, p = 0.002) with the procedure of using a training system of VRS for IV injection compared to having training via an IV arm simulator. This study verified that VRS for IV injection was more effective than an IV arm simulator for practical training on IV injection. Thus, VRS for IV injection, an effective teaching method used to improve learning ability and satisfaction levels, can be used as a training method in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Sun Lee, 2022. "Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation: Intravenous Injection Training System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5439-:d:805614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenora A. McWilliams & Ann Malecha, 2017. "Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-11, January.
    2. María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares & María-Camino Escolar-Llamazares & Álvar Arnaiz González, 2020. "Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Nursing Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares & Celia Carrillo & María del Camino Escolar Llamazares & Sandra Rodríguez Arribas & Diego Serrano Gómez, 2022. "Nursing Students’ Perceived Satisfaction with Flipped Learning Experiences: A Mixed-Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Monika Ravik & Anton Havnes & Ida Torunn Bjørk, 2017. "Conditions Affecting the Performance of Peripheral Vein Cannulation during Hospital Placement: A Case Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, November.
    3. Shih-Ling Lin & Tzu-Hsing Wen & Gregory S. Ching & Yu-Chen Huang, 2021. "Experiences and Challenges of an English as a Medium of Instruction Course in Taiwan during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez, 2020. "Sex and Careers of University Students in Educational Practices as Factors of Individual Differences in Learning Environment and Psychological Factors during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Aleksandra Kobicheva & Elena Tokareva & Tatiana Baranova, 2022. "Students’ Affective Learning Outcomes and Academic Performance in the Blended Environment at University: Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5439-:d:805614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.