IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4875-d795713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Group Exercise Programs Improve Health Outcomes in Pregnant Women? An Updated Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Rebeca de Castro

    (ESECS—Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Raul Antunes

    (ESECS—Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal
    Life Quality Research Centre (CIEQV), 2040-413 Leiria, Portugal
    Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Polytechnic of Leiria, 2410-541 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Diogo Mendes

    (ESECS—Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal
    Life Quality Research Centre (CIEQV), 2040-413 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Anna Szumilewicz

    (Department of Fitness, Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Rita Santos-Rocha

    (ESDRM Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior—Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal
    CIPER Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Human Performance, Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), University of Lisbon, 1499-002 Cruz Quebrada, Portugal)

Abstract

Current scientific evidence supports the recommendation to initiate or continue physical exercise in healthy pregnant women. Group exercise programs have positive effects on improving health, well-being, and social support. In 2015, a systematic review was provided to evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of group exercise programs in improving pregnant women’s and newborns’ health outcomes and to assess the content of the programs. This review aims to update this knowledge between 2015 and 2020. The exercise program designs were analyzed with the Consensus of Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) model, the compliance with the current guidelines, and effectiveness in the maternal health and fitness parameters. Three databases were used to conduct literature searches. Thirty-one randomized control trials were selected for analysis. All studies followed a supervised group exercise program including aerobic, resistance, pelvic floor training, stretching, and relaxation sections. Group interventions during pregnancy improved health and fitness outcomes for the women and newborns, although some gaps were identified in the interventions. Multidisciplinary teams of exercise and health professionals should advise pregnant women that group exercise improves a wide range of health outcomes for them and their newborns.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebeca de Castro & Raul Antunes & Diogo Mendes & Anna Szumilewicz & Rita Santos-Rocha, 2022. "Can Group Exercise Programs Improve Health Outcomes in Pregnant Women? An Updated Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-36, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4875-:d:795713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque & María José Aguilar-Cordero & Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez & Ana María Núñez-Negrillo & Antonio Manuel Sánchez-López & Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, 2020. "Influence of a Water-Based Exercise Program in the Rate of Spontaneous Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Carmen W. H. Chan & Elce Au Yeung & Bernard M. H. Law, 2019. "Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions on Pregnancy-Related Outcomes among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-42, May.
    3. Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque & María José Aguilar-Cordero & Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez & María José Menor-Rodríguez & Maria Montiel-Troya & Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, 2020. "Water Exercise and Quality of Life in Pregnancy: A Randomised Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shelly Ruart & Stéphane Sinnapah & Olivier Hue & Eustase Janky & Sophie Antoine-Jonville, 2020. "Prenatal Counseling throughout Pregnancy: Effects on Physical Activity Level, Perceived Barriers, and Perinatal Health Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Wei Zhang & Ying Jin & Ningning Liu & Zhenzhen Xiang & Xiaojuan Wang & Ping Xu & Pingping Guo & Minna Mao & Suwen Feng, 2022. "Predicting Physical Activity in Chinese Pregnant Women Using Multi-Theory Model: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Vilma Dudonienė & Raija Kuisma, 2023. "Women’s Knowledge and Perceptions of the Effect of Exercise during Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-9, January.
    4. Carmen W.H. Chan & Daria Tai & Stephanie Kwong & Ka Ming Chow & Dorothy N.S. Chan & Bernard M.H. Law, 2020. "The Effects of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Symptom Management and Quality of Life among Breast Cancer Survivors Undergoing Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-44, April.
    5. Farah Nawabi & Franziska Krebs & Laura Lorenz & Arim Shukri & Adrienne Alayli & Stephanie Stock, 2022. "Health Literacy among Pregnant Women in a Lifestyle Intervention Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4875-:d:795713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.