IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i3p795-d313648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of a Water-Based Exercise Program in the Rate of Spontaneous Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque

    (Research Group CTS1068, Andalusia Research Plan, Junta de Andalucía, San Cecilio Clinical Hospital, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • María José Aguilar-Cordero

    (Research Group CTS 367, Andalusia Research Plan, Junta de Andalucía, School of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Granada, San Cecilio Clinical Hospital, 18071 Granada, Sapin)

  • Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez

    (Research Group CTS1068, Andalusia Research Plan, Junta de Andalucía, Quantitative methods for the economics and enterprise, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Ana María Núñez-Negrillo

    (Research Group CTS367, Andalusia Research Plan, Junta de Andalucía, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Antonio Manuel Sánchez-López

    (Research Group CTS367, Department of Human Motricity and Sports Performance, Faculty of Education Science, University of Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Juan Carlos Sánchez-García

    (Research Group CTS1068, Andalusia Research Plan, Junta de Andalucía., School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Introduction : Many women change their lifestyles and habits when they become pregnant, to avoid potentially harmful effects to themselves and their babies. This is especially so with respect to physical exercise, which is often greatly reduced due to ignorance of the benefits it provides during pregnancy. Aim : To evaluate the prevalence of spontaneous birth among women who participated in a water-based physical exercise program. Methods : A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a sample of 129 pregnant women (Control Group, CG = 64; Exercise Group, EG = 65). A physical exercise protocol, specifically designed for pregnant women, was created and applied. Those in the EG performed 60 min exercise sessions, three times per week for 17 weeks. The participants in the CG received routine check-ups and advice throughout their pregnancy. Findings : The women in the EG presented better results for the onset of spontaneous birth (OR = 2.060 (0.980–4.332)) and for neonate Apgar score of 10 at five minutes (OR = 8.53 (3.60–20.17)). Those who had normal weight at the start of pregnancy achieved better results for spontaneous delivery (OR = 2.099 (1.017–4.335)) than those with overweight/obesity. The rate of caesarean delivery was higher in the women with overweight/obesity (OR = 3.570 ((1.226–10.397)) than in those with normal weight. Conclusions : In our study, the women who followed the water-based exercise program gained less weight during pregnancy, which facilitated a better rate of spontaneous, non-instrumental childbirth, together with a better Apgar test score at five minutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque & María José Aguilar-Cordero & Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez & Ana María Núñez-Negrillo & Antonio Manuel Sánchez-López & Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, 2020. "Influence of a Water-Based Exercise Program in the Rate of Spontaneous Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:795-:d:313648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rebeca de Castro & Raul Antunes & Diogo Mendes & Anna Szumilewicz & Rita Santos-Rocha, 2022. "Can Group Exercise Programs Improve Health Outcomes in Pregnant Women? An Updated Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-36, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:795-:d:313648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.