IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4566-d790873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big and Mini : A Promising Intergenerational Program for Social Connections

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Xu

    (School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, 211 S. Cooper Street, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Noelle L. Fields

    (School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, 211 S. Cooper Street, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Zhirui Chen

    (School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, 211 S. Cooper Street, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Allen Zhou

    (Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Aditi Merchant

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Anthony Zhou

    (Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

Abstract

Introduction: To help older adults cope with loneliness during COVID-19, a weekly, telephone-based intergenerational program called “ Big and Mini ” was created in April 2020 to link young and older adults together. As part of an evaluation of Big and Mini , a survey with both close and open-ended questions was sent to participants. Methods: A total of 63 Bigs and 53 Minis completed the survey. Their stress compared to before COVID-19, loneliness, life satisfaction, intergenerational closeness, and satisfaction with the program were measured for participants. Descriptive, bivariate correlation and conventional content analyses were conducted. Results: On average, Bigs and Minis had participated in the program for 3.73 and 3.49 months, respectively. Approximately half of the Bigs (47.6%) and Minis (52.8%) felt the same stress level compared to before COVID-19. A few participants felt “less stressed” compared to before COVID -9 (14.3 and 7.5%, respectively, for Bigs and Minis). All participants reported medium levels of loneliness, high levels of satisfaction with life, satisfaction with the program, and intergenerational closeness. Content analysis suggested that the reasons to join or expectations of the program were friendship, mutually beneficial intergenerational connections, and coping with loneliness. Conclusions: The Big and Mini program offers a promising approach with mutual benefits for participants. Strategies to improve the program and implications for intergenerational programs are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Xu & Noelle L. Fields & Zhirui Chen & Allen Zhou & Aditi Merchant & Anthony Zhou, 2022. "Big and Mini : A Promising Intergenerational Program for Social Connections," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4566-:d:790873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Giraudeau & Nathalie Bailly, 2019. "Intergenerational programs: What can school-age children and older people expect from them? A systematic review," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 363-376, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Kliegel & Susanne Iwarsson & Morten Wahrendorf & Nadia Minicuci & Marja J. Aartsen, 2020. "The European Journal of Ageing at the beginning of the Decade of Healthy Ageing," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-2, March.
    2. Jeremy Holloway & Owais Sayeed & Donald Jurivich, 2023. "Tellegacy: An Intergenerational Wellness and Health Promotion Project to Reduce Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: A Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Neda Norouzi & Jacqueline L. Angel, 2023. "Intergenerational Day Centers: A New Wave in Adult and Child Day Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Karl Pillemer & Julia Nolte & Leslie Schultz & Harry Yau & Charles R. Henderson & Marie Tillema Cope & Barbara Baschiera, 2022. "The Benefits of Intergenerational Wisdom-Sharing: A Randomized Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Jason D. E. Proulx & Julia W. Van de Vondervoort & J. Kiley Hamlin & John F. Helliwell & Lara B. Aknin, 2023. "Are Real-World Prosociality Programs Associated with Greater Psychological Well-Being in Primary School-Aged Children?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4566-:d:790873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.