IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3479-d771711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boredom Proneness Predicts Self-Assessed Decision Errors in Sports but Is Unrelated to Risk Taking in General

Author

Listed:
  • Wanja Wolff

    (Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
    Institute of Educational Science, Educational Psychology, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Maik Bieleke

    (Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

  • Lucas Keller

    (Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany)

Abstract

Introduction : Boredom proneness is linked to poor self-regulation, leading to poor decision making and/or increased risk taking. These links have not yet been investigated in the domain of sports and exercise. However, poor decisions or excessive risk behavior would be highly detrimental to sporting performance and, in some cases, even cause physical harm. Here, we address this gap by assessing if boredom proneness is linked to general risk taking, sport-specific risk taking, and to regrets about sports-specific decision errors with respect to acting too risky or too passively. Methods : N = 936 athletes (27.6 ± 9.0 years, 89.6% men): n = 330 Climbers (31.8 ± 10.7 years, 82.4% men), n = 83 Snowboarders (29.9 ± 8.3 years, 79.5% men), and n = 523 Esports athletes (24.6 ± 6.3 years, 95.8% men) completed the Short Boredom Proneness Scale (SBPS), along with measures for objective risk taking (Balloon Analogue Risk Task; BART), subjective risk taking (general willingness to take risks), as well as assessments for sport-specific risk taking and regrets for sports-specific decision errors (taking too many risks, failing to act at all). In the two extreme sports samples (i.e., climbers and snowboarders), we additionally assessed self-selected outcome certainty in a hypothetical sports-specific scenario where an error would result in physical harm. Results : A series of multiple regression analyses revealed that boredom proneness was unrelated to objective and subjective general risk taking, but a significant predictor of sport-specific risk taking and higher risk taking in the sports scenario (climbers and snowboarders only). Most importantly, boredom proneness predicted regrets for taking too many risks and being too passive. Exploratory post-hoc analyses further indicated that boredom proneness in extreme sports athletes was lower than in esports athletes. Higher boredom proneness was significantly related to lower skill levels across all kinds of sport. Discussion : Across three athlete samples, boredom proneness was unrelated to general risk taking but significantly related to poorer decision making, as indicated by regrets about acting too risky and too passively, as well as demanding a significantly lower safety threshold to make a risky sports-specific choice. While at odds with the often-reported link between boredom proneness and risk taking, these results are consistent with the conceptualization of boredom proneness as a maladaptive self-regulatory disposition that leads to noisy decision making in sports. In addition, we provide preliminary evidence that boredom proneness covaries with self-selection into specific types of sports and might also stand in the way of skill acquisition in sports.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanja Wolff & Maik Bieleke & Lucas Keller, 2022. "Boredom Proneness Predicts Self-Assessed Decision Errors in Sports but Is Unrelated to Risk Taking in General," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3479-:d:771711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanja Wolff & Corinna S. Martarelli & Julia Schüler & Maik Bieleke, 2020. "High Boredom Proneness and Low Trait Self-Control Impair Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Corinna S. Martarelli & Wanja Wolff, 2020. "Too bored to bother? Boredom as a potential threat to the efficacy of pandemic containment measures," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Audrin & Marine Hascoët, 2021. "Bored to Be Wild: How Boredom Is Related to Pre-Service Teachers’ Intention to Persist in Their Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Wanja Wolff & Corinna S. Martarelli & Julia Schüler & Maik Bieleke, 2020. "High Boredom Proneness and Low Trait Self-Control Impair Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Cyril Atkinson-Clement & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "What can we learn from Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on human behaviour? The case of France’s lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Eugene Song & Jae-Eun Lee & Seola Kwon, 2021. "Effect of Public Empathy with Infection-Control Guidelines on Infection-Prevention Attitudes and Behaviors: Based on the Case of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Patti C. Parker & Virginia M. C. Tze & Lia M. Daniels & Alyse Sukovieff, 2021. "Boredom Intervention Training Phase I: Increasing Boredom Knowledge through a Psychoeducational Video," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Sylvie Droit-Volet & Sandrine Gil & Natalia Martinelli & Nicolas Andant & Maélys Clinchamps & Lénise Parreira & Karine Rouffiac & Michael Dambrun & Pascal Huguet & Benoît Dubuis & Bruno Pereira & COVI, 2020. "Time and Covid-19 stress in the lockdown situation: Time free, «Dying» of boredom and sadness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Corinna S. Martarelli & Wanja Wolff & Maik Bieleke, 2021. "Bored by bothering? A cost-value approach to pandemic boredom," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Li, Ying & Luan, Shenghua & Li, Yugang & Hertwig, Ralph, 2021. "Changing emotions in the COVID-19 pandemic: A four-wave longitudinal study in the United States and China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    9. Víctor Revilla-Cuesta & Marta Skaf & Juan Manuel Varona & Vanesa Ortega-López, 2021. "The Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Social Impact on Education: Were Engineering Teachers Ready to Teach Online?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Silke Ohlmeier & Corinna Klingler & Isabell Schellartz & Holger Pfaff, 2022. "Having a Break or Being Imprisoned: Influence of Subjective Interpretations of Quarantine and Isolation on Boredom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Anne Marie Novak & Adi Katz & Michal Bitan & Shahar Lev-Ari, 2022. "The Association between the Sense of Coherence and the Self-Reported Adherence to Guidelines during the First Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Md Shahzalal & Hamedi Mohd Adnan, 2022. "Attitude, Self-Control, and Prosocial Norm to Predict Intention to Use Social Media Responsibly: From Scale to Model Fit towards a Modified Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3479-:d:771711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.