IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2164-d749524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors in the French Population: Results and Evolution between Two Cross-Sectional Population-Based Studies, 2006 and 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Verdot

    (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology Team, Santé Publique France, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, University Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-93017 Bobigny, France)

  • Benoît Salanave

    (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology Team, Santé Publique France, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, University Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-93017 Bobigny, France)

  • Salomé Aubert

    (Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance, Ottawa, ON K1H 5B2, Canada)

  • Andréa Ramirez Varela

    (School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota 11001000, Colombia)

  • Valérie Deschamps

    (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology Team, Santé Publique France, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, University Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-93017 Bobigny, France)

Abstract

Insufficient physical activity and sedentary behaviors (SB) are major risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Monitoring the prevalence of physical activity (PA) and SB is essential to meet the health needs of the population. This article presents the prevalence of PA and SB in the French population and their evolution during the last decade. Data come from two cross-sectional surveys, representative of the population in France, the “Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé” 2006–2007 and the Esteban study 2014–2016, and were collected through the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire for adults, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey and specific questionnaire for children. In 2014–2016, 71% of men and 53% of women met the PA recommendations (5 or more days per week with a moderate-intensity physical activity of at least 30 min per day). Since 2006–2007, PA has decreased for women, but increased for men; 80% of adults reported a daily leisure screen time of at least three hours in 2014–2016, in strong growth since 2006–2007. Among children, only 51% of boys and 33% of girls were meeting the PA recommendations (at least 60 min of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity daily). PA decreased significantly after the age of 10. Three-quarters of children spent two hours or more in front of a screen every day. These results show a lack of PA, in particular among women and girls, a high prevalence of SB in the French population, and a deterioration of these behaviours between 2006 and 2016.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Verdot & Benoît Salanave & Salomé Aubert & Andréa Ramirez Varela & Valérie Deschamps, 2022. "Prevalence of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors in the French Population: Results and Evolution between Two Cross-Sectional Population-Based Studies, 2006 and 2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2164-:d:749524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Loyen & Hidde P van der Ploeg & Adrian Bauman & Johannes Brug & Jeroen Lakerveld, 2016. "European Sitting Championship: Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Reported Sitting Time in the 28 European Union Member States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Montenegro Mendoza & Reina Roa & Flavia Fontes & Ilais Moreno Velásquez & Hedley Quintana, 2023. "Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behaviour among Panamanian Adults: Results from the National Health Survey of Panama (ENSPA) 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Szczuka, Zofia & Kulis, Ewa & Boberska, Monika & Banik, Anna & Kruk, Magdalena & Keller, Jan & Knoll, Nina & Scholz, Urte & Abraham, Charles & Luszczynska, Aleksandra, 2021. "Can individual, dyadic, or collaborative planning reduce sedentary behavior? A randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Anne Loyen & Tien Chey & Lina Engelen & Adrian Bauman & Jeroen Lakerveld & Hidde P van der Ploeg & Johannes Brug & Josephine Y Chau, 2018. "Recent trends in population levels and correlates of occupational and leisure sitting time in full-time employed Australian adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Jason A Bennie & Katrien De Cocker & Jordan J Smith & Glen H Wiesner, 2020. "The epidemiology of muscle-strengthening exercise in Europe: A 28-country comparison including 280,605 adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Moreno-Llamas, Antonio & García-Mayor, Jesús & De la Cruz-Sánchez, Ernesto, 2020. "The impact of digital technology development on sitting time across Europe," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. H. Q. Chim & Mirjam G. A. oude Egbrink & Pascal W. M. Van Gerven & Renate H. M. de Groot & Bjorn Winkens & Hans H. C. M. Savelberg, 2020. "Academic Schedule and Day-to-Day Variations in Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity of University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Menno Luijkx & Marco Helbich, 2019. "Neighborhood Walkability Is Not Associated with Adults’ Sedentary Behavior in the Residential Setting: Evidence from Breda, The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Lakerveld, Jeroen & Woods, Catherine & Hebestreit, Antje & Brenner, Hermann & Flechtner-Mors, Marion & Harrington, Janas M. & Kamphuis, Carlijn B.M. & Laxy, Michael & Luszczynska, Aleksandra & Mazzocc, 2020. "Advancing the evidence base for public policies impacting on dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Europe: The Policy Evaluation Network promoting a multidisciplinary approac," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2164-:d:749524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.