IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2148-d749267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholder Involvement in Decision-Making for Alcohol Treatment and Prevention Services

Author

Listed:
  • Hayley Alderson

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Eileen Kaner

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Amy O’Donnell

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Angela Bate

    (Coach Lane Campus West, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)

Abstract

The concept of providing individuals with a ‘voice’ via stakeholder involvement has been advocated within English health care policy for several decades. Stakeholder involvement encourages people affected by an issue to contribute to planning and decision making regarding treatment and care, inclusive of providers and recipients of care. This paper explores stakeholder involvement in the design and delivery of public health alcohol services. A qualitative case study approach was adopted, including in-depth interviews with 11 alcohol commissioners, 10 alcohol service providers and 6 general practitioners plus three facilitated focus groups with 31 alcohol service users. Findings show that most participants were aware of, and could name, various methods of stakeholder involvement that they had engaged with; however, the extent and impact of stakeholder involvement in decision making are not transparent. It is essential that a deeper understanding is generated of the different roles that stakeholders can play within the entire decision-making process to maximise its utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayley Alderson & Eileen Kaner & Amy O’Donnell & Angela Bate, 2022. "A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholder Involvement in Decision-Making for Alcohol Treatment and Prevention Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2148-:d:749267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panos Kanavos & Olivier Wouters & Jean Mossman & Mary G. Baker & Ingrid Kössler, 2017. "Patient Power as a Driver for Change: Reality or Rhetoric?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 133-138, March.
    2. Baggott, Rob & Jones, Kathryn, 2014. "The voluntary sector and health policy: The role of national level health consumer and patients' organisations in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 202-209.
    3. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s2:p:133-138 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Robert McMurray, 2007. "Our Reforms, Our Partnerships, Same Problems: The Chronic Case of the English NHS," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 77-82, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epstein, Steven, 2016. "The politics of health mobilization in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 246-254.
    2. Wynen, Jan & Boon, Jan & Kleizen, Bjorn & Verhoest, Koen, 2020. "How multiple organizational changes shape managerial support for innovative work behavior : Evidence from the Australian Public Service," Other publications TiSEM 4f721d76-0c44-4d72-a494-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s2:p:133-138 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Croft, Charlotte & Currie, Graeme, 2020. "Realizing policy aspirations of voluntary sector involvement in integrated care provision: Insights from the English National Health Service," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 549-555.
    5. Panos Kanavos & Olivier Wouters & Jean Mossman & Mary G. Baker & Ingrid Kössler, 2017. "Patient Power as a Driver for Change: Reality or Rhetoric?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 133-138, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2148-:d:749267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.