IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1861-d743834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of Mumps Vaccination in Fiji: Static Model Simulation of Routine Measles–Mumps–Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Instead of Current Measles–Rubella (MR) Vaccination

Author

Listed:
  • Chunghyeon Oh

    (Department of Surgery, CWM Hospital, 1 Waimanu Road, Suva, Fiji
    Fiji Office, Korea International Cooperation Agency, 91 Gordon St., Suva, Fiji)

  • Eric Rafai

    (Department for Research, Innovation, Data Analysis Management & Information Technology, Ministry of Health & Medical Services, 88 Amy Street, Suva, Fiji)

  • Yinseo Cho

    (West Africa Division, Korea International Cooperation Agency, Seongnam-si 13449, Korea)

  • Damin Jun

    (Performance Management Team, Korea International Cooperation Agency, Seongnam-si 13449, Korea)

  • Seungman Cha

    (Department of Global Development and Entrepreneurship, Graduate School of Global Development and Entrepreneurship, Handong Global University, Pohang 37554, Korea
    Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

Abstract

Mumps remains endemic in Fiji, with 7802 cases reported between 2016 and 2018. The introduction of mumps vaccination has been discouraged due to perceptions of mumps as a self-limited disease and the perceived high cost of mumps vaccines. We estimated the benefits and costs of introducing a mumps vaccination program in Fiji. First, we estimated the burden of mumps and mumps-related complications in Fiji based on the reported cases in the Fiji National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System between 2016 and 2018. We then developed a static simulation model with stable mumps herd immunity after routine measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccination. Finally, we compared the estimated economic burden of mumps with current MR vaccination and the assumptive burden of the stable-state simulation model after routine MMR vaccination. The benefit–cost ratios (BCRs) were 2.65 from the taxpayer view and 3.00 from the societal view. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the 1st and 99th percentiles of BCRs were 1.4 and 5.2 from the taxpayer’s perspective and 1.5 and 6.1 from the societal perspective. From both the taxpayer and societal perspectives, the probability of BCRs greater than 1.0 was 100%. A routine MMR program has value for money from both the taxpayer and societal perspectives. MMR vaccination should be urgently introduced in Fiji.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunghyeon Oh & Eric Rafai & Yinseo Cho & Damin Jun & Seungman Cha, 2022. "An Economic Analysis of Mumps Vaccination in Fiji: Static Model Simulation of Routine Measles–Mumps–Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Instead of Current Measles–Rubella (MR) Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1861-:d:743834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shih-Bin Su & Hsiao-Liang Chang & Kow-Tong Chen, 2020. "Current Status of Mumps Virus Infection: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Vaccine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1861-:d:743834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.