IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1406-d735230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Personalized Breast Cancer Screening Program: Views of Spanish Health Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Celmira Laza-Vásquez

    (Health Care Research Group (GRECS), Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain)

  • María José Hernández-Leal

    (Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Department of Economics, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43003 Tarragona, Spain
    Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain)

  • Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila

    (Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Department of Economics, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43003 Tarragona, Spain
    Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain)

  • Maria José Pérez-Lacasta

    (Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Department of Economics, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43003 Tarragona, Spain
    Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain)

  • Inés Cruz-Esteve

    (Primer de Maig Basic Health Area, Catalan Health Institute (ICS), 25003 Lleida, Spain)

  • Montserrat Rué

    (Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain
    Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain)

  • on behalf of the DECIDO Group

    (Collaborators of the DECIDO group are indicated in the Acknowledgment section.)

Abstract

This study explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a risk-based breast cancer screening program from the point of view of Spanish health professionals. A cross-sectional study with 220 Spanish health professionals was designed. Data were collected in 2020 via a web-based survey and included the advantages and disadvantages of risk-based screening and barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the program. Descriptive statistics and Likert scale responses analyzed as category-ordered data were obtained. The risk-based screening was considered important or very important to reduce breast cancer mortality and promote a more proactive role for women in breast cancer prevention, to increase coverage for women under 50 years, to promote a breast cancer prevention strategy for women at high risk, and to increase efficiency and effectiveness. Switching to a risk-based program from an age-based program was rated as important or very important by 85% of participants. As barriers for implementation, risk communication, the workload of health professionals, and limited human and financial resources were mentioned. Despite the barriers, there is good acceptance, and it seems feasible, from the perspective of health professionals, to implement a risk-based breast cancer screening program in Spain. However, this poses a number of organizational and resource challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Celmira Laza-Vásquez & María José Hernández-Leal & Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila & Maria José Pérez-Lacasta & Inés Cruz-Esteve & Montserrat Rué & on behalf of the DECIDO Group, 2022. "Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Personalized Breast Cancer Screening Program: Views of Spanish Health Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1406-:d:735230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willems, Barbara & Bracke, Piet, 2018. "Participants, Physicians or Programmes: Participants’ educational level and initiative in cancer screening," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 422-430.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Celmira Laza-Vásquez & Montserrat Martínez-Alonso & Carles Forné-Izquierdo & Jordi Vilaplana-Mayoral & Inés Cruz-Esteve & Isabel Sánchez-López & Mercè Reñé-Reñé & Cristina Cazorla-Sánchez & Marta Hern, 2022. "Feasibility and Acceptability of Personalized Breast Cancer Screening (DECIDO Study): A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zapata-Moya, Angel R. & Freese, Jeremy & Bracke, Piet, 2023. "Mechanism substitution in preventive innovations: Dissecting the reproduction of health inequalities in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    2. Rydland, Håvard T., 2020. "Monitoring the social gradient: Inequalities in use of blood pressure monitors in the HUNT study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1406-:d:735230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.