IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1100-d728577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work among Korean Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Minsun Kim

    (Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea)

  • Jaehoon Kim

    (Department of Counseling Psychology, Global Cyber University, Seoul 06022, Korea)

Abstract

The goal of the present study is to examine the psychology of working framework/theory with a sample of Korean workers. This study examined the structural model of sociocultural factors (i.e., economic constraints and social marginalization), psychological variables (i.e., work volition and career adaptability), and outcomes of decent work based on the psychology of working framework. This study assumed that decent work helps all workers attain a sense of self-respect, dignity, experience freedom and security in the work environment and provides an opportunity for workers to contribute to society. Data were collected from 420 Korean workers, with an average age of 39.13 years (SD = 9.26). We used a hypothesis model that did not assume a direct path from economic constraints and social marginalization to decent work and work volition and career adaptation to job satisfaction and life satisfaction. We also employed an alternative model that assumed all of its paths and compared the models’ goodness of fit based on prior studies. Results indicated that alternative models have higher goodness of fit than hypothesis models. All path coefficients were significant except for the direct path from social marginalization to work volition and career adaptability to life satisfaction. Additionally, work volition and career adaptability mediated both the relationship between social marginalization and job satisfaction and between marginalization and life satisfaction. This study enabled the comprehensive examination of the relevance of various social environments and psychological and occupational characteristics that should be considered when exploring job or life satisfaction in the process of career counseling.

Suggested Citation

  • Minsun Kim & Jaehoon Kim, 2022. "Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work among Korean Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1100-:d:728577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Zammitti & Paola Magnano & Giuseppe Santisi, 2020. "“Work and Surroundings”: A Training to Enhance Career Curiosity, Self-Efficacy, and the Perception of Work and Decent Work in Adolescents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Yin Ma & Junjer You & Yuanxiong Tang, 2019. "Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work Perception with Chinese Nursing College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mara Marini & Stefano Livi & Laura Prislei & Chiara Parisse & Alessandra Cecalupo & Federica Scarci & Guido Benvenuto, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Barriers to Career Advancement: A Study with a Sample of Italian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Ya Wen & Huaruo Chen & Xindong Wei & Kai Li & Fei Liu & Xia Liu, 2022. "Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work among Chinese Female Pre-Service Primary School Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jui-Chung Kao & Hsiang-Yu Ma & Nein-Tsu Chiang & Rui-Hsin Kao & Cheng-Chung Cho, 2021. "How to Establish a Sustainable Organization? A Study on the Relationship between Social Work Characteristics and Innovativeness for Employees of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    2. William E. Donald, 2022. "The Conceptualisation of Weather as a Career Metaphor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Pilhyoun Yoon & Juhee Hahn, 2021. "Contradictory Aspects of Job Searching in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Relationships between Perceived Socioeconomic Constraints, Work Volition, and the Meaning of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Ya Wen & Huaruo Chen & Xindong Wei & Kai Li & Fei Liu & Xia Liu, 2022. "Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work among Chinese Female Pre-Service Primary School Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1100-:d:728577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.