IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p974-d725711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rural Household Production of Health Approach: Applying Lessons from Zambia to Rural Cancer Disparities in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Mutale Chileshe

    (Behavioural Science Unit, Clinical Sciences Department, Michael Chilufya Sata School of Medicine, Copperbelt University, Ndola P.O. Box 21692, Zambia
    Deceased (born 1978, died 2021).)

  • Emma Nelson Bunkley

    (Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA)

  • Jean Hunleth

    (Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA)

Abstract

The recent focus on rural–urban cancer disparities in the United States (U.S.) requires a comprehensive understanding of the processes and relations that influence cancer care seeking and decision making. This is of particular importance for Black, Latino, and Native populations living in rural areas in the U.S., who remain marginalized in health care spaces. In this article, we describe the household production of health approach (HHPH) as a contextually-sensitive approach to examining health care seeking and treatment decisions and actions. The HHPH approach is based on several decades of research and grounded in anthropological theory on the household, gender, and therapy management. This approach directs analytical attention to how time, money, and social resources are secured and allocated within the household, sometimes in highly unequal ways that reflect and refract broader social structures. To demonstrate the benefits of such an approach to the study of cancer in rural populations in the U.S., we take lessons from our extensive HHPH research in Zambia. Using a case study of a rural household, in which household members had to seek care in a distant urban hospital, we map out what we call a rural HHPH approach to bring into focus the relations, negotiations, and interactions that are central to individual and familial health care seeking behaviors and clinical treatment particular to rural regions. Our aim is to show how such an approach might offer alternative interpretations of existing rural cancer research in the U.S. and also present new avenues for questions and for developing interventions that are more sensitive to people’s realities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mutale Chileshe & Emma Nelson Bunkley & Jean Hunleth, 2022. "The Rural Household Production of Health Approach: Applying Lessons from Zambia to Rural Cancer Disparities in the U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:974-:d:725711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berman, Peter & Kendall, Carl & Bhattacharyya, Karabi, 1994. "The household production of health: Integrating social science perspectives on micro-level health determinants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 205-215, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonu, Sekhar & Rani, Manju & Jha, Prabhat & Peters, David H. & Nguyen, Son Nam, 2004. "Household tobacco and alcohol use, and child health: an exploratory study from India," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 67-83, October.
    2. Patrick Sakdapolrak & Thomas Seyler & Christina Ergler, 2013. "Burden of direct and indirect costs of illness: Empirical findings from slum settlements in Chennai, South India," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 13(2), pages 135-151, April.
    3. Thomas Porter & Jane Chuma & Catherine Molyneux, 2009. "Barriers to managing chronic illness among urban households in coastal Kenya," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 271-290.
    4. Jan Saarela & Maria Stanfors & Mikael Rostila, 2021. "Ethnic Composition of Couples and Mutual Health Benefit Receipt: Register-Based Evidence from Finland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Russell, Steven & Gilson, Lucy, 2006. "Are health services protecting the livelihoods of the urban poor in Sri Lanka? Findings from two low-income areas of Colombo," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1732-1744, October.
    6. Saarela, Jan & Stanfors, Maria & Rostila, Mikael, 2019. "In sickness or in health? Register-based evidence on partners' mutual receipt of sickness allowance and disability pension," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Demydas, Tetyana, 2013. "Lifestyle factors, dietary quality and health: Econometric evidence from US micro data," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 94(2).
    8. Paula L. Griffiths & James J. Brown & Peter W. F. Smith, 2004. "A comparison of univariate and multivariate multilevel models for repeated measures of use of antenatal care in Uttar Pradesh," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(4), pages 597-611, November.
    9. Cardol, Mieke & Groenewegen, Peter P. & Spreeuwenberg, Peter & Van Dijk, Liset & Van Den Bosch, Wil J.H.M. & De Bakker, Dinny H., 2006. "Why does it run in families? Explaining family similarity in help-seeking behaviour by shared circumstances, socialisation and selection," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 920-932, August.
    10. Joe Varghese & V. Raman Kutty, 2012. "Governability Framework for the Evaluation and Implementation of Complex Public Health Functions," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(4), pages 303-319, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:974-:d:725711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.