IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p640-d719217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientometric Analysis of Public Health Emergencies: 1994–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Liu

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Yujie Wang

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Qian Zhang

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Jianxiang Wei

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
    Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu-Information Industry Integration Innovation and Emergency Management Research Center, Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Haihua Zhou

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to summarize the research hotspots and frontiers in the field of public health emergencies (PHE) between 1994–2020 through the scientometric analysis method. In total, 2247 literature works retrieved from the Web of Science core database were analyzed by CiteSpace software, and the results were displayed in knowledge mapping. The overall characteristics analysis showed that the number of publications and authors in the field of PHE kept an upward trend during the past decades, and the United States was in the leading position, followed by China and England. Switzerland has the highest central value and plays an important intermediary role in promoting the integration and exchange of international PHE research achievements. The keyword co-occurrence analysis indicated that COVID-19 was the most high-frequency keyword in this field, and there had been no new keywords for a long time until the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2019. The burst detection analysis showed that the top five burst keywords in terms of burst intensity were zika virus, Ebola, United States, emergency preparedness and microcephaly. The results indicated that the research theme of PHE is closely related to the major infectious diseases in a specific period. It will continue to develop with more attention paid to public health. The conclusions can provide help and reference for the PHE potential researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Liu & Yujie Wang & Qian Zhang & Jianxiang Wei & Haihua Zhou, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of Public Health Emergencies: 1994–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:640-:d:719217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.304051_2 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marta Marsilio & Giulia Cappellaro & Corrado Cuccurullo, 2011. "The Intellectual Structure Of Research Into PPPs," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 763-782, September.
    3. Elena Savoia & Foluso Agboola & Paul D. Biddinger, 2014. "A Conceptual Framework to Measure Systems’ Performance during Emergency Preparedness Exercises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Savoia, E. & Lin, L. & Bernard, D. & Klein, N. & James, L.P. & Guicciardi, S., 2017. "Public Health System Research in Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States (2009-2015): Actionable Knowledge Base," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(S2), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minxi Wang & Ping Liu & Zhaoliang Gu & Hong Cheng & Xin Li, 2019. "A Scientometric Review of Resource Recycling Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Alessandra Tafuro & Giuseppe Dammacco & Antonio Costa, 2023. "A Conceptual Study on the Role of Blockchain in Sustainable Development of Public–Private Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Schoch-Spana, Monica & Ravi, Sanjana J. & Martin, Elena K., 2022. "Modeling epidemic recovery: An expert elicitation on issues and approaches," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    5. Fabrizio Sarto & Corrado Cuccurullo & Massimo Aria, 2014. "Exploring healthcare governance literature: systematic review and paths for future research," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(91), pages 61-80.
    6. Leanne Burton & Abbie Wall & Elizabeth Perkins, 2022. "Making It Work: The Experiences of Delivering a Community Mental Health Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Qingna Pan & Jincheng Zhou & Duo Yang & Dingpu Shi & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2023. "Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Nannan Wang & Minxun Ma, 2021. "Public–private partnership as a tool for sustainable development – What literatures say?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 243-258, January.
    9. Igor Rosa Dias Jesus & Helder Gomes Costa, 2015. "Interfaces between production engineering and the public affairs: evidences from bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1183-1193, November.
    10. Jiangang Shi & Kaifeng Duan & Guangdong Wu & Rui Zhang & Xiaowei Feng, 2020. "Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the public–private partnerships (PPPs) research field: a new bibliometric journey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2145-2184, September.
    11. Duo Yang & Jincheng Zhou & Dingpu Shi & Qingna Pan & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Global Digital Education via Knowledge Graph Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    12. David Baxter & Carter B. Casady, 2020. "Proactive and Strategic Healthcare Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the Coronavirus (Covid-19) Epoch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    13. Veiko LEMBER & Ole Helby PETERSEN & Walter SCHERRER & Robert ÅGREN, 2019. "Understanding The Relationship Between Infrastructure Public‒Private Partnerships And Innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 371-391, June.
    14. Oluwole Abayomi Soyinka & Mesthrige Jayantha Wadu & Udara Willhelm Abeydera Lebunu Hewage & Timo Olugbenga Oladinrin, 2023. "Scientometric review of construction demolition waste management: a global sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10533-10565, October.
    15. Mohamed Nour & Mohd Alhajri & Elmoubasher A. B. A. Farag & Hamad E. Al-Romaihi & Mohamed Al-Thani & Salih Al-Marri & Elena Savoia, 2017. "How Do the First Days Count? A Case Study of Qatar Experience in Emergency Risk Communication during the MERS-CoV Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Jian Zhou & Chuhan Wang & Xinyu Zhang & Shuang Wang, 2022. "Public Health System and Socio-Economic Development Coupling Based on Systematic Theory: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Lima, Sónia & Brochado, Ana & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Public-private partnerships in the water sector: A review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Giuseppe Liddo & Alessandro Rubino & Ernesto Somma, 2019. "Determinants of PPP in infrastructure investments in MENA countries: a focus on energy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(4), pages 523-580, December.
    19. Annalisa Caloffi & Stephen Pryke & Silvia R Sedita & Matti Siemiatycki, 2017. "Public–private partnerships and beyond: Potential for innovation and sustainable development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 739-745, August.
    20. Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David, 2019. "Bibliometric outlook of the most cited documents in business, management and accounting in Ibero-America," SocArXiv cqa3z, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:640-:d:719217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.