IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16751-d1002571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

16 Weeks of Physically Active Mathematics and English Language Lessons Improves Cognitive Function and Gross Motor Skills in Children Aged 8–9 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Boat

    (Sport, Health, and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK)

  • Simon B. Cooper

    (Sport, Health, and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK)

  • Fabio Carlevaro

    (Polo Universitario Asti Studi Superiori (Uni-Astiss), 14100 Asti, Italy)

  • Francesca Magno

    (University of Torino, Torino, Italy)

  • Giulia Bardaglio

    (University of Torino, Torino, Italy)

  • Giovanni Musella

    (Polo Universitario Asti Studi Superiori (Uni-Astiss), 14100 Asti, Italy
    University of Torino, Torino, Italy)

  • Daniele Magistro

    (Sport, Health, and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of physically active lessons, implemented through the Mathematics and English Language curriculum, on cognitive function and gross motor skill development. Following ethical approval, 192 children aged 8–9 years were randomly allocated to an intervention group ( n = 98) or a control group ( n = 94). The intervention consisted of 8 h.wk −1 of physically active lessons, equally split between Mathematics and English Language, for 16 weeks. Cognitive function (digit span, coding and arithmetic reasoning) and gross motor skill development (TGMD-3) were assessed at baseline and follow-up. The improvement in every domain of cognitive function was greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (group * time, p = 0.008–0.023, d = 0.34–0.42). Furthermore, total TGMD-3 score (group * time, p < 0.001, d = 1.16) and both sub-scales (locomotor, p < 0.001, d = 0.63; object control, p < 0.001, d = 1.29) also improved by a greater extent in the intervention group than in the control group. These findings suggest that 16 weeks of physically active lessons, taught in both Mathematics and English Language curriculum, synergistically improved cognitive function and gross motor skill development in primary school children aged 8–9 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Boat & Simon B. Cooper & Fabio Carlevaro & Francesca Magno & Giulia Bardaglio & Giovanni Musella & Daniele Magistro, 2022. "16 Weeks of Physically Active Mathematics and English Language Lessons Improves Cognitive Function and Gross Motor Skills in Children Aged 8–9 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16751-:d:1002571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chloe Bedard & Laura St John & Emily Bremer & Jeffrey D Graham & John Cairney, 2019. "A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of physically active classrooms on educational and enjoyment outcomes in school age children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Barbosa & Stephen Whiting & Philippa Simmonds & Rodrigo Scotini Moreno & Romeu Mendes & João Breda, 2020. "Physical Activity and Academic Achievement: An Umbrella Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Barbara Fenesi & Jeffrey D. Graham & Madeline Crichton & Michelle Ogrodnik & Jasmyn Skinner, 2022. "Physical Activity in High School Classrooms: A Promising Avenue for Future Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Beatriz Polo-Recuero & Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado & Alfonso Ordóñez-Dios & Denise Breitkreuz & Alberto Lorenzo, 2021. "The Effects of Bike Desks in Formal Education Classroom-Based Physical Activity: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Myrto F. Mavilidi & Sue Bennett & Fred Paas & Anthony D. Okely & Spyridoula Vazou, 2021. "Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Julia Lynch & Gráinne O’Donoghue & Casey L. Peiris, 2022. "Classroom Movement Breaks and Physically Active Learning Are Feasible, Reduce Sedentary Behaviour and Fatigue, and May Increase Focus in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16751-:d:1002571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.