IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16486-d997484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics in Search of Evidence—The Role of Public Health in the COVID Pandemic in Germany: Protocol for a Situational Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Piel

    (Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Marilena von Köppen

    (Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Christian Apfelbacher

    (Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

Abstract

The protocol presents a research project that explores the relationship between science and politics in the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of public health (PH) scientists in Germany with situational analysis (SA). In context of this global crisis, we ask how PH scientists negotiate their roles as scientists and political citizens; how PH scientists perceive the relationship between their own and other scientific disciplines; and which normative assumptions PH scientists make in the production and dissemination of research findings. To conduct SA, we combine qualitative interviews with PH experts and published documents from scientific societies in PH and related disciplines (e.g., position and opinion papers) to analyze the complexity of integrating evidence-based knowledge into politics. Data are analyzed using different SA mapping tools, focusing on social worlds/arena maps and positional maps. The approach will reveal both explicit positions in the PH community and implicit or hidden voices and will reflect normative assumptions as well as internal structures of PH in Germany. The findings will be discussed with the philosophy sub-project and in a stakeholder workshop with politicians and the public. Further insights will be gained for politics and PH responses to future global crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Piel & Marilena von Köppen & Christian Apfelbacher, 2022. "Politics in Search of Evidence—The Role of Public Health in the COVID Pandemic in Germany: Protocol for a Situational Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16486-:d:997484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Arnautu & Christian Dagenais, 2021. "Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strzałkowski, Andrzej, 2024. "Adaptation and operationalisation of sustainable degrowth for policy: Why we need to translate research papers into legislative drafts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Ruth Stewart & Harsha Dayal & Laurenz Langer & Carina van Rooyen, 2022. "Transforming evidence for policy: do we have the evidence generation house in order?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Frederiksen, Marianne Harbo & Wolf, Patricia & Klotz, Ute, 2024. "Citizen visions of drone uses and impacts in 2057: Far-future insights for policy decision-makers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16486-:d:997484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.