IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16194-d992634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry

Author

Listed:
  • Frieder Dechent

    (University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Julian Moeller

    (University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
    Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Christian G. Huber

    (University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland)

Abstract

In acute psychiatry, where people with severe mental disorders are frequently treated, there can be contradictions between concepts of illness among, e.g., patients and healthcare professionals, and also between medical and legal aspects. These contradictions do not manifest themselves openly but are immanent in the social practices of the treatment teams as contradictions between the social level and the individual level. They can lead to alienation, which may be reflected in poorer quality of treatment, such as the more frequent use of coercive measures or poorer adherence to therapy in patients. In the normal daily routine of a clinic, these contradictions are mostly hidden by hierarchical structures or by unbalanced concepts of psychiatric illness, or external critique is used to try to solve these contradictions. However, another way of dealing with these contradictions could be to analyze the potential and causes for alienation through systematic analysis and transformation of the whole system of a psychiatric ward to reduce the level of contradiction within it. The aim of this work is to use the concept of meaning elaborated by Luhmann to identify and recognize alienation potentials as concretely as possible and thus make them accessible to immanent critique. Meaning in Luhmann’s use of the term serves to reduce complexity in a social context and always opens up consequential possibilities for action. Consequential limited possibilities at the level of action in a rigid social system (which psychiatric wards can be) can—at an individual level—lead to people subordinating themselves to the rigid system to an excessive degree and thus alienating themselves from the system. Thus, a rigid system with a narrowing of consequential possibilities excludes meaningful consequential possibilities. This leads to alienating contradictions and to possibilities of world appropriation being missed. The aim of the current analysis is not to make a general critique of psychiatry but to improve the theoretical basis to better understand the problem of alienation in acute psychiatry as a symptom of system-immanent contradictions and thus open up the possibility of transforming systems, e.g., psychiatric acute care units, by means of immanent critique.

Suggested Citation

  • Frieder Dechent & Julian Moeller & Christian G. Huber, 2022. "Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16194-:d:992634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mykhalovskiy, Eric & Armstrong, Pat & Armstrong, Hugh & Bourgeault, Ivy & Choiniere, Jackie & Lexchin, Joel & Peters, Suzanne & White, Jerry, 2008. "Qualitative research and the politics of knowledge in an age of evidence: Developing a research-based practice of immanent critique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 195-203, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Copelton, Denise A. & Valle, Giuseppina, 2009. ""You don't need a prescription to go gluten-free": The scientific self-diagnosis of celiac disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 623-631, August.
    2. Colvin, Christopher J., 2022. "Understanding global health policy engagements with qualitative research: Qualitative evidence syntheses and the OptimizeMNH guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    3. Morton Ninomiya, Melody E., 2015. "Revealing disjunctures: Making tensions between fetal alcohol spectrum disorder diagnoses and institutional supports visible," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 38-46.
    4. Finn, Rachael & Learmonth, Mark & Reedy, Patrick, 2010. "Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1148-1154, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16194-:d:992634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.