IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15314-d978126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting the Reduction in Urban Air Pollution by Expansion of Market Shares of Eco-Friendly Vehicles: A Focus on Seoul, Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hanghun Jo

    (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Hanyang University, Wangsimri-ro 222, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Seong-A Kim

    (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Hanyang University, Wangsimri-ro 222, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Heungsoon Kim

    (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Hanyang University, Wangsimri-ro 222, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Due to global climate change, various countries have agreed upon the use of conventions. In this study, the eco-friendly vehicular policy on carbon neutrality implemented in Seoul, Korea, was examined. To this end, various policy-based scenarios were set, and the changes in automotive exhaust gas emissions were evaluated and compared. The evaluation method combined macroscopic and microscopic emission models as its analysis framework. Micro-traffic data available in Korea were used for analyses, and the results for all autonomous districts were derived to cover the entire area of Seoul. The findings confirmed that the most effective measure is the initial replacement of old, mid-size, or large diesel passenger cars with eco-friendly vehicles (Middle-sized: Scenario 2-1 5.52%, Scenario 2-2 6.86%, Scenario 3-1 80.93%, and Scenario 3-2 83.98%). The replacement of old vehicles exhibited the highest effect in all tested scenarios, while the initial replacement of diesel vehicles was more effective than the replacement of gasoline and liquified petroleum gas vehicles (Diesel: Scenario2-1 6.64%, Scenario 2-2 8.21%, Scenario3-1 86.23%, and Scenario 3-2 90.51%). Among the autonomous districts of Seoul, the Gangnam-gu area exhibited the largest emission-reduced effect among all the tested scenarios (Gangnam-gu: Scenario 2-1 5.80%, Scenario 2-2 6.74%, Scenario 3-1 80.44%, and Scenario 3-2 82.62%). Overall, it was demonstrated that the findings of this study may have significant policy implications in terms of urban emission changes pertaining to transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanghun Jo & Seong-A Kim & Heungsoon Kim, 2022. "Forecasting the Reduction in Urban Air Pollution by Expansion of Market Shares of Eco-Friendly Vehicles: A Focus on Seoul, Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15314-:d:978126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kilyong Choi & Wonho Yang, 2021. "Psychological Changes and Cancer Occurrence in Seoul Citizens Due to Changes in Fine Dust Concentration before Seoul Fine Dust Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Kim, Imjung & Kim, Junghun & Lee, Jongsu, 2020. "Dynamic analysis of well-to-wheel electric and hydrogen vehicles greenhouse gas emissions: Focusing on consumer preferences and power mix changes in South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Shin, Jungwoo & Hwang, Won-Sik & Choi, Hyundo, 2019. "Can hydrogen fuel vehicles be a sustainable alternative on vehicle market?: Comparison of electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 239-248.
    4. Solhee Kim & Rylie E. O. Pelton & Timothy M. Smith & Jimin Lee & Jeongbae Jeon & Kyo Suh, 2019. "Environmental Implications of the National Power Roadmap with Policy Directives for Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Osorio, Carolina & Nanduri, Kanchana, 2015. "Urban transportation emissions mitigation: Coupling high-resolution vehicular emissions and traffic models for traffic signal optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 520-538.
    6. Prabhakar Sharma & Ajay Chhillar & Zafar Said & Saim Memon, 2021. "Exploring the Exhaust Emission and Efficiency of Algal Biodiesel Powered Compression Ignition Engine: Application of Box–Behnken and Desirability Based Multi-Objective Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Jooho Park & Yasushi Honda & Sayaka Fujii & Satbyul Estella Kim, 2022. "Air Pollution and Public Bike-Sharing System Ridership in the Context of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Li & Lei Ma & Zheng Liu & Chaonan Yi & Kaitong Liang, 2023. "Dual Carbon Goal-Based Quadrilateral Evolutionary Game: Study on the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ko, Sungmin & Shin, Jungwoo, 2023. "Projection of fuel cell electric vehicle demand reflecting the feedback effects between market conditions and market share affected by spatial factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Lucian-Ioan Dulău, 2023. "CO 2 Emissions of Battery Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Lee, Jeongeun & Koo, Yoonmo, 2023. "A general equilibrium analysis of individual choice behavior on alternative fuel vehicles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    4. Park, Soyeong & Maeng, Kyuho & Shin, Jungwoo, 2023. "Efficient subsidy distribution for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles based on demand segmentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    5. Moon, Sungho & Kim, Kyungah & Seung, Hyunchan & Kim, Junghun, 2022. "Strategic analysis on effects of technologies, government policies, and consumer perceptions on diffusion of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Kim, Kyungah & Lee, Jongsu & Kim, Junghun, 2021. "Can liquefied petroleum gas vehicles join the fleet of alternative fuel vehicles? Implications of transportation policy based on market forecast and environmental impact," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Moon, HyungBin & Park, Stephen Youngjun & Woo, JongRoul, 2021. "Staying on convention or leapfrogging to eco-innovation?: Identifying early adopters of hydrogen-powered vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Zheng, Liang & Xue, Xinfeng & Xu, Chengcheng & Ran, Bin, 2019. "A stochastic simulation-based optimization method for equitable and efficient network-wide signal timing under uncertainties," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 287-308.
    9. Osorio, Carolina & Punzo, Vincenzo, 2019. "Efficient calibration of microscopic car-following models for large-scale stochastic network simulators," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 156-173.
    10. Kim, Kyungah & Choi, Jihye & Lee, Jihee & Lee, Jongsu & Kim, Junghun, 2023. "Public preferences and increasing acceptance of time-varying electricity pricing for demand side management in South Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    12. Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2017. "A search acceleration method for optimization problems with transport simulation constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 239-260.
    13. Liu, Yajie & Dong, Feng & Wang, Yulong & Li, Jingyun & Qin, Chang, 2023. "Assessment of the energy-saving and environment effects of China's gasoline vehicle withdrawal under the impact of geopolitical risks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    14. Junwoo Song & Simon Hu & Ke Han & Chaozhe Jiang, 2020. "Nonlinear Decision Rule Approach for Real-Time Traffic Signal Control for Congestion and Emission Mitigation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 675-702, September.
    15. Nithin Isaac & Akshay Kumar Saha, 2022. "Predicting Vehicle Refuelling Trips through Generalised Poisson Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Jia, Wenjian & Jiang, Zhiqiu & Wang, Qian & Xu, Bin & Xiao, Mei, 2023. "Preferences for zero-emission vehicle attributes: Comparing early adopters with mainstream consumers in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 21-32.
    17. Choi, Hyunhong & Woo, JongRoul, 2022. "Investigating emerging hydrogen technology topics and comparing national level technological focus: Patent analysis using a structural topic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    18. Osorio, Carolina, 2019. "High-dimensional offline origin-destination (OD) demand calibration for stochastic traffic simulators of large-scale road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 18-43.
    19. Nithin Isaac & Akshay Kumar Saha, 2023. "Analysis of Refueling Behavior Models for Hydrogen-Fuel Vehicles: Markov versus Generalized Poisson Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Sustainability of China’s New Energy Vehicle Development: Fresh Evidence from Population Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15314-:d:978126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.