IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14862-d970191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Strategic Interaction between Government and Farmers in Rural Passive Energy Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Shengyue Fan

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Shuai Zha

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Chenxi Zhao

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

In the implementation of public environmental policies, the deviation between the behavioral intention of farmers and the results of policy implementation is widespread. To reveal the universality, and break through existing research perspectives, this paper, starting from the interaction between the government and farmers, builds a rural passive energy transformation mechanism conceptual model. Using the policy of “coal to gas” in northern China area as a case, a comprehensive analysis of the influencing factors of peasant household behavior response is presented, using a structural equation to compute the interaction strength between the two agents. The results of the study show that: (1) the standardized path coefficients of household behavioral intention and government policy characteristics on household behavioral response are 0.458 and 0.554, respectively. The effect of government is stronger than that of households, which highlights the change effect of government on household behavioral responses and explains the reason for the deviation between behavioral intention and behavioral response; and (2) The standardized correlation coefficient between government policy characteristics and farmers’ behavioral intention is 0.858, indicating that the interaction between government and farmers has a significant impact on policy results, and verifies the important role of research on the interactions between government and farmers. Therefore, in order to improve the effect of rural energy transformation, it is necessary to strengthen the interactions between the government and farmers, to smooth the channels of farmers’ demands, and to form a pattern of air pollution control with government guidance and full participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengyue Fan & Shuai Zha & Chenxi Zhao, 2022. "Study on Strategic Interaction between Government and Farmers in Rural Passive Energy Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14862-:d:970191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zhaohua & Zhang, Bin & Yin, Jianhua & Zhang, Yixiang, 2011. "Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behaviour: Evidence from Beijing, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3550-3557, June.
    2. Yue, Ting & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2013. "Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 665-675.
    3. Fan, Shengyue & Zha, Shuai & Zhao, Chenxi & Sizheng, Fangyuan & Li, Meihui, 2022. "Using energy vulnerability to measure distributive injustice in rural heating energy reform: A case study of natural gas replacing bulk coal for heating in Gaocheng District, Hebei Province, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Budya, Hanung & Yasir Arofat, Muhammad, 2011. "Providing cleaner energy access in Indonesia through the megaproject of kerosene conversion to LPG," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7575-7586.
    5. Acharya, Rajesh H. & Sadath, Anver C., 2017. "Implications of energy subsidy reform in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 453-462.
    6. Michelsen, Carl Christian & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Switching from fossil fuel to renewables in residential heating systems: An empirical study of homeowners' decisions in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 95-105.
    7. Hori, Shiro & Kondo, Kayoko & Nogata, Daisuke & Ben, Han, 2013. "The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 354-362.
    8. Yu, Yihua & Guo, Jin, 2016. "Identifying electricity-saving potential in rural China: Empirical evidence from a household survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-9.
    9. Leach, Gerald, 1992. "The energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 116-123, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Licheng Sun & Qunwei Wang & Shilong Ge, 2018. "Urban resident energy-saving behavior: a case study under the A2SC framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(2), pages 515-536, March.
    2. Quaglione, Davide & Cassetta, Ernesto & Crociata, Alessandro & Sarra, Alessandro, 2017. "Exploring additional determinants of energy-saving behaviour: The influence of individuals' participation in cultural activities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 503-511.
    3. Belaïd, Fateh & Garcia, Thomas, 2016. "Understanding the spectrum of residential energy-saving behaviours: French evidence using disaggregated data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 204-214.
    4. Quoc Nghi Nguyen & Thi Hong Loc Hoang & Van Nam Mai, 2022. "Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Analyze Household Energy-Saving Behavior," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 287-293, September.
    5. Wang, Shanyong & Lin, Shoufu & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exploring the effects of non-cognitive and emotional factors on household electricity saving behavior," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 171-180.
    6. Fan, Shengyue & Zha, Shuai & Zhao, Chenxi & Sizheng, Fangyuan & Li, Meihui, 2022. "Using energy vulnerability to measure distributive injustice in rural heating energy reform: A case study of natural gas replacing bulk coal for heating in Gaocheng District, Hebei Province, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Kabeya Clement Mulamba, 2021. "Relationship between education and households’ electricity-saving behaviours in South Africa: A multilevel logistic analysis," ERSA Working Paper Series, Economic Research Southern Africa, vol. 0.
    8. Sylwia Słupik & Joanna Kos-Łabędowicz & Joanna Trzęsiok, 2021. "Energy-Related Behaviour of Consumers from the Silesia Province (Poland)—Towards a Low-Carbon Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Long, Ruyin & Wang, Jiaqi & Chen, Hong & Li, Qianwen & Wu, Meifen & Tan-Soo, Jie-Sheng, 2023. "Applying multilevel structural equation modeling to energy-saving behavior: The interaction of individual- and city-level factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Yu, Yihua & Guo, Jin, 2016. "Identifying electricity-saving potential in rural China: Empirical evidence from a household survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Zou, Baoling & Mishra, Ashok K., 2020. "Appliance usage and choice of energy-efficient appliances: Evidence from rural Chinese households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Kabeya Clement Mulamba, 2020. "Relationship between education and households? electricity-saving behaviour in South Africa: A multilevel logistic analysis," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(2), pages 51-74.
    13. WeiYu Ji & Edwin H. W. Chan, 2019. "Critical Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Home Energy Technology in China: A Guangdong Province Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Wang, Xia & Ding, Chao & Cai, Weiguang & Luo, Lizi & Chen, Mingman, 2021. "Identifying household cooling savings potential in the hot summer and cold winter climate zone in China: A stochastic demand frontier approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Lin, Boqiang & Lan, Tianxu, 2023. "Progress of increasing-block electricity pricing policy implementation in China's first-tier cities and the impact of resident policy perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. Kuai, Peng & Zhang, Xiaoxiao & Zhang, Shuan & Li, Jing, 2022. "Environmental awareness and household energy saving of Chinese residents: Unity of knowing and doing or easier said than done?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Liu, Chang & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Is increasing-block electricity pricing effectively carried out in China? A case study in Shanghai and Shenzhen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Guo Li & Wenling Liu & Zhaohua Wang & Mengqi Liu, 2017. "An empirical examination of energy consumption, behavioral intention, and situational factors: evidence from Beijing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 507-524, August.
    19. Nieves García-de-Frutos & José Manuel Ortega-Egea & Javier Martínez-del-Río, 2018. "Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 411-435, March.
    20. Damette, Olivier & Delacote, Philippe & Lo, Gaye Del, 2018. "Households energy consumption and transition toward cleaner energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 751-764.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14862-:d:970191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.