IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14859-d970170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Moralization as a Persuasion Strategy in Public Health Messages: A Cross-Sectional, Experimental Study on Vaping

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Arhiri

    (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Str. Toma Cozma 3, 700554 Iasi, Romania)

  • Mihaela Alexandra Gherman

    (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Str. Toma Cozma 3, 700554 Iasi, Romania)

  • Andrei Corneliu Holman

    (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Str. Toma Cozma 3, 700554 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Using moralization in anti-vaping public health messages as a persuasion strategy was recently recommended to address the current vaping epidemic. However, previous findings indicated this could lead to moralized attitudes in the general population, which can be very difficult to change and could severely affect social cohesion and distort risk perception. Since the safety and efficiency of using electronic cigarettes as smoking cessation devices are still being investigated, we conducted a cross-sectional, experimental study on a convenience sample of 612 Romanian never vapers, never smokers to assess how exposure to moralizing public health messages about vaping might influence their trust in future scientific results about this topic. Participants were randomized into six groups according to the type of message (“moral,” “immoral,” “neutral”) and the type of effects of vaping on smokers’ health, documented in a future fictitious study (“health benefits,” “health risks”). Results showed that the type of message moderated trust in future scientific results after controlling for participants’ general trust in science. When vaping was framed as immoral, trust in future scientific results showing health benefits was decreased, and vice versa. Implications are discussed for using moralization strategically in public health messaging to curtail or promote certain health behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Arhiri & Mihaela Alexandra Gherman & Andrei Corneliu Holman, 2022. "Using Moralization as a Persuasion Strategy in Public Health Messages: A Cross-Sectional, Experimental Study on Vaping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14859-:d:970170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Arhiri & Mihaela A. Gherman & Andrei C. Holman, 2022. "A Person-Centered Approach to Moralization—The Case of Vaping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Hee‐Je Bak, 2001. "Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the “Deficit Model” of Education and Support for Science and Technology," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 82(4), pages 779-795, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vainio, Annukka & Paloniemi, Riikka, 2014. "The complex role of attitudes toward science in pro-environmental consumption in the Nordic countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 18-27.
    2. Sylvie Tchumtchoua & Dipak Dey, 2012. "Modeling Associations Among Multivariate Longitudinal Categorical Variables in Survey Data: A Semiparametric Bayesian Approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 670-692, October.
    3. Anders Brostrom & Cornelia Lawson & Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo, 2024. "Are Scientists Perceived as Credible Experts?," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-06, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.
    4. Nicolas Hamelin & Passant Halawa, 2024. "Harnessing Social Media for Climate Action in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Lizbeth Salgado-Beltrán & Luis F. Beltrán-Morales & Alma T. Velarde-Mendivil & María E. Robles-Baldenegro, 2018. "Attitudes and Sensory Perceptions of Food Consumers towards Technological Innovation in Mexico: A Case-Study on Rice-Based Dessert," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Minda Hu & Ashwin Rao & Mayank Kejriwal & Kristina Lerman, 2021. "Socioeconomic Correlates of Anti-Science Attitudes in the US," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14859-:d:970170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.