IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14593-d965254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining the Primary Work Stress Factors of Chinese Coal Miners—A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hongxi Di

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China
    Energy Economy and Management Research Center, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shujahat Ali

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China
    Department of Banking and Finance, Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur 10250, AJK, Pakistan)

  • Yiming Lu

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China)

Abstract

Background: Studies have indicated that coal miners in China have higher levels of perceived job stress. However, few studies have investigated the work stress structure of coal miners. Objective: Our study focused on the work stress of coal miners in China, with a primary aim to determine the work stress structure of coal miners in China using a mixed-methods approach. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were performed with thirty-three people (team leaders and frontline coal miners) conducted with participants from various state-owned large- and medium-sized coal mines in China. Grounded theory was used to construct an initial model for the concept of coal miners’ work stress. Using the results of this initial survey and findings in the existing literature, we then constructed a preliminary questionnaire regarding coal miners’ work stress and administered the questionnaire to 900 coal miners in the Shaanxi, Henan, Inner Mongolia, and Gansu provinces. Results: The results show that the work stress structure for coal miners differs from that for other occupational types in China, due to differences in the Chinese culture and foreign cultural influences. We revised our questionnaire based on these considerations and administered a new survey to the frontline production workers in coal mines. The preliminary questionnaires were revised and analyzed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, resulting in a final formal model for work stress, which was supported by content and structural validity. Conclusion: In this research, we used the framework of grounded theory to conduct an empirical analysis of the structure model of coal miners’ work stress. The findings support that the primary work stress factors of Chinese coal miners included the stress of the work environment, job responsibility, interpersonal relationships, career development, the family environment, and organizational systems. Coal enterprises should therefore always take these factors into consideration when developing and implementing safety management policies aimed at to improve the occupational health status of coal miners.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongxi Di & Shujahat Ali & Yiming Lu, 2022. "Defining the Primary Work Stress Factors of Chinese Coal Miners—A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14593-:d:965254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xia, Ying & Schyns, Birgit & Zhang, Li, 2020. "Why and when job stressors impact voice behaviour: An ego depletion perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 200-209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Umer Azeem & Inam Ul Haq & Ghulam Murtaza & Hina Jaffery, 2023. "Challenge–Hindrance Stressors, Helping Behavior and Job Performance: Double-Edged Sword of Religiousness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 687-699, May.
    2. Tang, Jiansheng & Zhou, Jiamin & Zheng, Chundong & Jiao, Sijing, 2022. "More expectations, more disappointments: Ego depletion in uncertain promotion," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Khan, Nabila & Dyaram, Lata & Dayaram, Kantha, 2022. "Team faultlines and upward voice in India: The effects of communication and psychological safety," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 540-550.
    4. Chenlin Liu & Siwei Sun & Francisca N. Mapiye Dube, 2021. "The Buffering Effects of Subordinates’ Forgiveness and Communication Openness on Abusive Supervision and Voice Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    5. Diogo Alves & Ana Patrícia Duarte & Miriam Rosa & Sílvia da Silva, 2024. "Do they need us? Linking functional indispensability and voice behavior: The role of psychological ownership, job insecurity and organizational ambidexterity," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 363-388, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14593-:d:965254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.