IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14504-d963814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Serendipitous Campus Meetings: A User Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sascha Naomi Jansz

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Environment, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
    Research Group Facility Management, Research Centre for Built Environment—NoorderRuimte, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Mark Mobach

    (Research Group Facility Management, Research Centre for Built Environment—NoorderRuimte, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands
    Research Group Spatial Environment and the User, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2521 EN The Hague, The Netherlands)

  • Terry van Dijk

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Environment, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Esther de Vries

    (Tranzo, Tilburg School for Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Roeland van Hout

    (Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

With campuses opening up and stimulating interactions among different campus users more and more, we aim to identify the characteristics of successful meeting places (locations) on campus. These can help practitioners such as campus managers and directors to further optimize their campus to facilitate unplanned or serendipitous meetings between academic staff and companies. A survey on three Dutch campuses, including questions on both services and locations, was analyzed both spatially and statistically using principal component (PC) and regression analysis. Four PCs were found for services (Relax, Network, Proximity and Availability) and three PCs were found for locations (Aesthetics, Cleaned and Indoor Environment). Personal characteristics as explanatory variables were not significant or only had very small effect sizes, indicating that a campus’ design does not need to be tailored to certain user groups but can be effective for all. The pattern of successful locations is discussed, including the variables in each PC. These PCs provide a framework for practitioners who want to improve their campus’ design to further facilitate unplanned meetings, thus contributing to cooperation between campus users, hopefully leading to further innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sascha Naomi Jansz & Mark Mobach & Terry van Dijk & Esther de Vries & Roeland van Hout, 2022. "On Serendipitous Campus Meetings: A User Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-32, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14504-:d:963814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Soares & Gerd Weitkamp & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Public Spaces as Knowledgescapes: Understanding the Relationship between the Built Environment and Creative Encounters at Dutch University Campuses and Science Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sascha Naomi Jansz & Mark Mobach & Terry van Dijk, 2023. "The 5-Minute Campus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Gamze Dane & Pauline van den Berg, 2021. "Editorial for the Special Issue on “Experiencing the City: The Relation between Urban Design and People’s Well-Being”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-6, March.
    2. Yu-Ling Peng & Yuan Li & Wei-Ying Cheng & Ke Wang, 2024. "Evaluation and Optimization of Sense of Security during the Day and Night in Campus Public Spaces Based on Physical Environment and Psychological Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Hans Löfsten & Magnus Klofsten, 2024. "Exploring dyadic relationships between Science Parks and universities: bridging theory and practice," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1914-1934, October.
    4. Sang-Jun Park & Ju-Hyung Kim & Min-Jung Maing & Jin-Ho Ahn & Yang-Gil Kim & Nam-Hyuk Ham & Jae-Jun Kim, 2023. "Transformation of Buildings and Urban Spaces to Adapt for Future Mobility: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14504-:d:963814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.