IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14408-d962641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Co-Design in Delivering Assistive Technology Interventions: Reconsidering Roles for Consumers, Allied Health Practitioners, and the Support Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Layton

    (Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
    Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Association (ARATA), Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia)

  • Jackie O’Connor

    (Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Association (ARATA), Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
    Allied Health Specialist Consultants, Seaton, SA 5023, Australia.)

  • Amy Fitzpatrick

    (Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Association (ARATA), Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia)

  • Sharon Carey

    (Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia)

Abstract

A complexity of factors, from health and technology innovations to policy redesign to achieve consumer-directed care, are impacting traditional roles for Australian allied health practitioners (AHPs). This pilot study considers roles for AHPs in relation to assistive technology (AT) interventions. Articulating ‘who does what’ may serve a number of purposes including de-professionalization of the discourse; better utilization of support networks and workforces; and alignment with contemporary policy. Yet, a suitable framework to assist with collaborative AT implementation between relevant stakeholders was not identified within the existing literature. This research aimed to develop and pilot an AT collaboration tool which enables AHPs, consumers, their support networks and the support workforce, to navigate policy redesign toward ethical consumer-directed implementation of AT interventions. An AT collaboration tool was developed based upon practice-based knowledge, relevant regulatory and practice evidence and identifies relevant stakeholders, AT service steps and roles, and quality indicators to support competent practice. The tool was piloted in four separate and diverse practice analyses of AT interventions (custom prosthetics, home enteral nutrition, communication devices, and vehicle modifications) considering four allied health professions (prosthetics and orthotics, dietetics, speech pathology, occupational therapy). Pilot testing of the tool supports the feasibility of re-framing AT provision using competency-based and risk-informed approaches and enabling more inclusive roles for consumers and the support workforce. Further testing of the tool is indicated, followed by strategic actions for uptake by individuals, professions and policymakers. The AT collaboration tool has potential to enable AHPs to fulfil ethical obligations for consumer-centered practice, and to facilitate consumer choice, both in Australia and internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Layton & Jackie O’Connor & Amy Fitzpatrick & Sharon Carey, 2022. "Towards Co-Design in Delivering Assistive Technology Interventions: Reconsidering Roles for Consumers, Allied Health Practitioners, and the Support Workforce," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14408-:d:962641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14408/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14408/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily J Steel, 2019. "The Duplicity of Choice and Empowerment: Disability Rights Diluted in Australia’s Policies on Assistive Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Pádraic Fleming & Sinead McGilloway & Marian Hernon & Mairead Furlong & Siobhain O'Doherty & Fiona Keogh & Tim Stainton, 2019. "Individualized funding interventions to improve health and social care outcomes for people with a disability: A mixed‐methods systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1-2), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nóra Menich, 2022. "Each Person as an End? The Users’ Choices in the Service Delivery Process for Assistive Technology in Hungary," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Marguerite Robinson & Marie Blaise & Germain Weber & Marc Suhrcke, 2022. "The Effects and Costs of Personalized Budgets for People with Disabilities: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Kathy Boschen & Caroline Phelan & Sharon Lawn, 2022. "NDIS Participants with Psychosocial Disabilities and Life-Limiting Diagnoses: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Mac Domhnaill, Ciarán & Lyons, Seán & McCoy, Selina, 2020. "Specialist support for persons with disabilities living in the community: Review of international practice," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT97.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14408-:d:962641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.