IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13674-d949374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motor Vehicle Crash and Hospital Charges in Front- and Rear-Seated Restrained and Unrestrained Adult Motor Vehicle Occupants

Author

Listed:
  • Joyce C. Pressley

    (Departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

  • Emilia Pawlowski

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Leah M. Hines

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Sabana Bhatta

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Michael J. Bauer

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

Abstract

There are reports that historically higher mortality observed for front- compared to rear-seated adult motor vehicle (MV) occupants has narrowed. Vast improvements have been made in strengthening laws and restraint use in front-, but not rear-seated occupants suggesting there may be value in expanding the science on rear-seat safety. Methods. A linked 2016–2017 hospital and MV crash data set, the Crash Outcomes Data Evaluation System (CODES), was used to compare characteristics of front-seated ( n = 115,939) and rear-seated ( n = 5729) adults aged 18 years and older involved in a MV crash in New York State (NYS). A primary enforced seat belt law existed for front-seated, but not rear-seated occupants. Statistical analysis employed SAS 9.4. Results. Compared to front-seated occupants, those rear-seated were more likely to be unrestrained (21.2% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.0001) and to have more moderate-to-severe injury/death (11.9% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.0001). Compared to restrained rear-seated occupants, unrestrained rear-seated occupants had higher moderate-to-severe injury/death (21.5% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.0001) and 4-fold higher hospitalization. More than 95% of ejections were unrestrained and had 7-fold higher medical charges. Unrestrained occupants’ hospital stays were longer, charges and societal financial costs higher. Conclusions. These findings extend the science of rear-seat safety in seriously injured rear-seated occupants, document increased medical charges and support the need to educate consumers and policy makers on the health and financial risks of adults riding unrestrained in the rear seat. The lack of restraint use in adult rear-seated motor vehicle occupants consumes scarce health care dollars for treatment of this serious, but largely preventable injury.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce C. Pressley & Emilia Pawlowski & Leah M. Hines & Sabana Bhatta & Michael J. Bauer, 2022. "Motor Vehicle Crash and Hospital Charges in Front- and Rear-Seated Restrained and Unrestrained Adult Motor Vehicle Occupants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13674-:d:949374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, L. & Frick, M.C., 1988. "Seating position in cars and fatality risk," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(11), pages 1456-1458.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joyce C. Pressley & Nirajan Puri & Tianhui He, 2023. "Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes in Upstate and Long Island New York: The Impact of High Visibility Seat Belt Enforcement on Multiple Risky Driving Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonard Evans & Michael C. Frick & Richard C. Schwing, 1990. "Is It Safer to Fly or Drive?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 239-246, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13674-:d:949374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.