IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13147-d940585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Capital, Political Efficacy and Chinese Residents’ Willingness to Participate in Food Safety Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Nianyu Du

    (College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Chuanmei Zhang

    (College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jin Qin

    (College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China)

  • Liangqiang Jiang

    (College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China)

  • Zongshuo Yin

    (College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China)

  • Mo Chen

    (College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China
    Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China)

Abstract

Residents play an important role as one of the main actors in food safety governance. To build a pattern of food safety risk co-governance, the positive and effective participation of residents is vital. This study first establishes a comprehensive analysis framework combining social capital theory and political efficacy theory. Data from a survey of 714 residents in Shandong Province, China, were analysed through structural equation modelling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine the causal relationship between residents’ willingness to participate and its driving factors. The results indicated that: (1) reciprocity norm, institutional trust and social engagement have significant positive effects on willingness to participate; (2) political efficacy has a partial mediating effect in the relationship between social capital and willingness to participate; (3) fsQCA findings have four solutions to achieving residents’ strong willingness to participate; reciprocity norm, institutional trust and political efficacy are the core elements that affected residents’ high willingness to participate, whereas social engagement and sociodemographic variables are the non-core variables. Therefore, we put forward suggestions for improving residents’ willingness to participate in food safety governance, including improving the appeal expression and feedback mechanism, cultivating residents’ social capital and paying attention to the superposition effect of social capital and political efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nianyu Du & Chuanmei Zhang & Jin Qin & Liangqiang Jiang & Zongshuo Yin & Mo Chen, 2022. "Social Capital, Political Efficacy and Chinese Residents’ Willingness to Participate in Food Safety Governance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13147-:d:940585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stancu, Violeta & Lähteenmäki, Liisa, 2022. "Consumer-related antecedents of food provisioning behaviors that promote food waste," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. repec:bla:jecsur:v:14:y:2000:i:5:p:629-53 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Analyzing collective action," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 155-166, November.
    4. Martin Paldam, 2000. "Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 629-653, December.
    5. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    6. Yiqing Su & Hailong Yu & Menglin Wang & Xinqi Li & Yanyan Li, 2022. "Why did China's cost‐reduction‐oriented policies in food safety governance fail? The collective action dilemma perspective," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(3), pages 203-217, September.
    7. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    8. Abramson, Paul R. & Aldrich, John H., 1982. "The Decline of Electoral Participation in America," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 502-521, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivens, Björn & Kasper-Brauer, Kati & Leischnig, Alexander & Thornton, Sabrina C., 2024. "Implementing customer relationship management successfully: A configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Beata Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2019. "Does Participation in Social Networks Foster Trust and Respect for Other People—Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Nikou, Shahrokh, 2018. "Internet of Things: Exploring households' intention to use smart home technology," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190335, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Markus Mayer & Markus Voeth, 2022. "Improving negotiation success in B2B sales organizations: is structured negotiation management a success factor?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 163-196, February.
    5. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Shuoyan He, 2024. "How does social capital affect farmers’ environment-friendly technology adoption behavior? A case study in Hubei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18361-18384, July.
    6. Hota, Monali & Bartsch, Fabian, 2019. "Consumer socialization in childhood and adolescence: Impact of psychological development and family structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 11-20.
    7. Robert Roßner & Dimitrios Zikos, 2018. "The Role of Homogeneity and Heterogeneity Among Resource Users on Water Governance: Lessons Learnt from an Economic Field Experiment on Irrigation in Uzbekistan," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-30, July.
    8. Agnès Helme-Guizon & Fanny Magnoni, 2019. "Consumer brand engagement and its social side on brand-hosted social media: how do they contribute to brand loyalty?," Post-Print hal-03591683, HAL.
    9. Jean–Luc Arregle & Bat Batjargal & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb & Toyah Miller & Anne S. Tsui, 2015. "Family Ties in Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks and New Venture Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 313-344, March.
    10. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption intention: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    12. Dong-Hong Zhu & Ya-Ping Chang, 2013. "Negative Publicity Effect of the Business Founder’s Unethical Behavior on Corporate Image: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 111-121, September.
    13. Paschalis Arvanitidis & Athina Economou & Christos Kollias, 2016. "Terrorism’s effects on social capital in European countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 231-250, December.
    14. Nedkovski, Vojkan & Guerci, Marco & De Battisti, Francesca & Siletti, Elena, 2017. "Organizational ethical climates and employee's trust in colleagues, the supervisor, and the organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 19-26.
    15. Sangryeong Lee & Soo-Kyoung Lee & Jin-Woo Park, 2024. "The Effect of Service Quality and Sustainability Practices on Brand Equity: The Case of Korean Air Passengers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Heiko Bergmann, 2017. "The formation of opportunity beliefs among university entrepreneurs: an empirical study of research- and non-research-driven venture ideas," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 116-140, February.
    17. Grohs, Reinhard & Raies, Karine & Koll, Oliver & Mühlbacher, Hans, 2016. "One pie, many recipes: Alternative paths to high brand strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2244-2251.
    18. Martin Gächter & David A. Savage & Benno Torgler, 2009. "Retaining the Thin Blue Line: What Shapes Workers' Intentions not to Quit the Current Work Environment," Working Papers 2010-05, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck, revised Mar 2010.
    19. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    20. Barry Cooper & Judith Glaesser, 2016. "Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how do results vary as case weights change?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 327-346, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13147-:d:940585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.