IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12200-d925726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation and Improvement of a Convolutional Neural Network to Predict the Involved Pathology in a Head and Neck Surgery Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Dorian Culié

    (Head and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France
    Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Renaud Schiappa

    (Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Sara Contu

    (Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Boris Scheller

    (Head and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France
    Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Agathe Villarme

    (Head and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Olivier Dassonville

    (Head and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Gilles Poissonnet

    (Head and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Alexandre Bozec

    (Head and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France
    Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

  • Emmanuel Chamorey

    (Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France)

Abstract

The selection of patients for the constitution of a cohort is a major issue for clinical research (prospective studies and retrospective studies in real life). Our objective was to validate in real life conditions the use of a Deep Learning process based on a neural network, for the classification of patients according to the pathology involved in a head and neck surgery department. 24,434 Electronic Health Records (EHR) from the first visit between 2000 and 2020 were extracted. More than 6000 EHR were manually classified in ten groups of interest according to the reason for consultation with a clinical relevance. A convolutional neural network (TensorFlow, previously reported by Hsu et al.) was then used to predict the group of patients based on their pathology, using two levels of classification based on clinically relevant criteria. On the first and second level of classification, macro-average performances were: 0.95, 0.83, 0.85, 0.97, 0.84 and 0.93, 0.76, 0.83, 0.96, 0.79 for accuracy, recall, precision, specificity and F1-score versus accuracy, recall and precision of 0.580, 580 and 0.582 for Hsu et al., respectively. We validated this model to predict the pathology involved and to constitute clinically relevant cohorts in a tertiary hospital. This model did not require a preprocessing stage, was used in French and showed equivalent or better performances than other already published techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorian Culié & Renaud Schiappa & Sara Contu & Boris Scheller & Agathe Villarme & Olivier Dassonville & Gilles Poissonnet & Alexandre Bozec & Emmanuel Chamorey, 2022. "Validation and Improvement of a Convolutional Neural Network to Predict the Involved Pathology in a Head and Neck Surgery Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12200-:d:925726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisher, E.S. & Whaley, F.S. & Krushat, W.M. & Malenka, D.J. & Fleming, C. & Baron, J.A. & Hsia, D.C., 1992. "The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: Progress has been made, but problems remain," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(2), pages 243-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jay Bhattacharya & Alan M. Garber & Matthew Miller & Daniella Perlroth, 2011. "The Value of Progress against Cancer in the Elderly," NBER Chapters, in: Investigations in the Economics of Aging, pages 203-233, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Carine Milcent, 2024. "Bias due to re-used databases: Coding in hospital for extremely vulnerable patients," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-03960584, HAL.
    3. Jay Bhattacharya & Alan M. Garber & Thomas MaCurdy, 2010. "The Narrowing Dispersion of Medicare Expenditures 1997 to 2005," NBER Chapters, in: Research Findings in the Economics of Aging, pages 387-407, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun & Johan Håkon Bjørngaard & Jon Magnussen, 2017. "Economic incentives and diagnostic coding in a public health care system," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 83-101, March.
    5. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun, 2022. "Predicting diagnostic coding in hospitals: individual level effects of price incentives," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 129-146, June.
    6. Krista F Huybrechts & Reesha Shah Sanghani & Jerry Avorn & Adam C Urato, 2014. "Preterm Birth and Antidepressant Medication Use during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. De Nicola, Arianna & Mancuso, Paolo & Valdmanis, Vivian, 2013. "Quality and health care performance in the Italian regions," MPRA Paper 50495, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Adam Powell & Sergei Savin & Nicos Savva, 2012. "Physician Workload and Hospital Reimbursement: Overworked Physicians Generate Less Revenue per Patient," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 512-528, October.
    9. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-03960584 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12200-:d:925726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.