IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11717-d917280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Park Quality with a Wearable Video Device and an Unmanned Aerial System

Author

Listed:
  • Richard R. Suminski

    (Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19726, USA)

  • Gregory M. Dominick

    (Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19726, USA)

  • Eric Plautz

    (Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19726, USA)

Abstract

Parks are ideal places for promoting physical activity, which is vital for achieving and sustaining good health. Thus, it is important to develop and provide the best methods for assessing aspects of parks that could influence physical activity. This study examined the use of high-tech video capture for describing park quality. Videos were obtained with a wearable video device (WVD) and an unmanned aerial system (UAS) at 28 and 17 parks, respectively. In-person audits of park attributes were performed using the Physical Activity Readiness Assessment (PARA) instrument while video was simultaneously captured. The PARA provides quality ratings of park attributes that range from poor to good. Kappa statistics were calculated to compare in-person PARA outcomes with PARA outcomes obtained by reviewing the WVD and UAS videos. Substantial and almost-perfect agreements were found between WVD and in-person PARAs on the quality of features and amenities and the severity of incivilities. Agreements between UAS and in-person PARAs on feature and amenity quality and incivility severity were unacceptable (mostly fair and moderate). In conclusion, being able to reliably assess park quality using video provides advantages over in-person assessments (e.g., retrospective analysis). In addition, it sets up the possibility of utilizing computer vision to automate the video analysis process.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard R. Suminski & Gregory M. Dominick & Eric Plautz, 2022. "Assessing Park Quality with a Wearable Video Device and an Unmanned Aerial System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11717-:d:917280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11717/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11717/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordan A. Carlson & Bo Liu & James F. Sallis & Jacqueline Kerr & J. Aaron Hipp & Vincent S. Staggs & Amy Papa & Kelsey Dean & Nuno M. Vasconcelos, 2017. "Automated Ecological Assessment of Physical Activity: Advancing Direct Observation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Bancroft, Carolyn & Joshi, Spruha & Rundle, Andrew & Hutson, Malo & Chong, Catherine & Weiss, Christopher C. & Genkinger, Jeanine & Neckerman, Kathryn & Lovasi, Gina, 2015. "Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 22-30.
    3. Jelle Van Cauwenberg & Ester Cerin & Anna Timperio & Jo Salmon & Benedicte Deforche & Jenny Veitch, 2017. "Is the Association between Park Proximity and Recreational Physical Activity among Mid-Older Aged Adults Moderated by Park Quality and Neighborhood Conditions?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sigit D. Arifwidodo & Orana Chandrasiri & Niramon Rasri & Wipada Sirawarong & Panitat Rattanawichit & Natsiporn Sangyuan, 2022. "Association between Park Visitation and Physical Activity among Adults in Bangkok, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Pedro Gullón & Julia Díez & Paloma Conde & Carmen Ramos & Valentín Márquez & Hannah Badland & Francisco Escobar & Manuel Franco, 2019. "Using Photovoice to Examine Physical Activity in the Urban Context and Generate Policy Recommendations: The Heart Healthy Hoods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Rosario Padial-Ruz & Mª Esther Puga-González & Álvaro Céspedes-Jiménez & David Cabello-Manrique, 2021. "Determining Factors in the Use of Urban Parks That Influence the Practice of Physical Activity in Children: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. M. Renée Umstattd Meyer & Tyler Prochnow & Marilyn E. Wende & Kelly R. Ylitalo & Rodney X. Sturdivant & Cassandra M. Johnson & Haley Delgado & Stewart G. Trost & Luis Gómez & Joseph R. Sharkey, 2024. "Physical Activity Outcomes of a Culturally Tailored, Father-Focused, and Family-Centered Health Promotion Program for Mexican-Heritage Families: ¡Haz Espacio Para Papi! (Make Room for Daddy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Abdullah Addas & Ahmad Maghrabi, 2021. "Social Evaluation of Public Open Space Services and Their Impact on Well-Being: A Micro-Scale Assessment from a Coastal University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Siqi Lai & Brian Deal, 2022. "Parks, Green Space, and Happiness: A Spatially Specific Sentiment Analysis Using Microblogs in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Richard R. Suminski & Gregory M. Dominick & Eric Plautz, 2019. "Validation of the Block Walk Method for Assessing Physical Activity occurring on Sidewalks/Streets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Mina Safizadeh & Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali & Aldrin Abdullah & Nor Zarifah Maliki, 2024. "Possible Actions in the Built Environment to Enhance Physical Activity: Systematic ‎Review," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-1, July.
    9. Eve Burrows & Margaret O’Mahony & Dermot Geraghty, 2018. "How Urban Parks Offer Opportunities for Physical Activity in Dublin, Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
    10. Sung-Kwon Hong & Sang-Woo Lee & Hyun-Kil Jo & Miyeon Yoo, 2019. "Impact of Frequency of Visits and Time Spent in Urban Green Space on Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Grace Katharine Forster & Leif Edvard Aarø & Maria Nordheim Alme & Thomas Hansen & Thomas Sevenius Nilsen & Øystein Vedaa, 2023. "Built Environment Accessibility and Disability as Predictors of Well-Being among Older Adults: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Alex Antonio Florindo & Ligia Vizeu Barrozo & William Cabral-Miranda & Eduardo Quieroti Rodrigues & Gavin Turrell & Moisés Goldbaum & Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar & Billie Giles-Corti, 2017. "Public Open Spaces and Leisure-Time Walking in Brazilian Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Stephanie L. Orstad & Kristin Szuhany & Kosuke Tamura & Lorna E. Thorpe & Melanie Jay, 2020. "Park Proximity and Use for Physical Activity among Urban Residents: Associations with Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Gregory S. Macfarlane & Emma Stucki & Alisha H. Redelfs & Lori Andersen Spruance, 2022. "Beyond Proximity: Utility-Based Access from Location-Based Services Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Chen, Xi & Lee, Chanam & Huang, Hao, 2022. "Neighborhood built environment associated with cognition and dementia risk among older adults: A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    16. Lincoln R Larson & Viniece Jennings & Scott A Cloutier, 2016. "Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Marcia G. Ory & Matthew Lee Smith, 2017. "What If Healthy Aging Is the ‘New Normal’?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-5, November.
    18. Viniece Jennings & Lincoln Larson & Jessica Yun, 2016. "Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Massimiliano Masullo & Luigi Maffei & Aniello Pascale & Vincenzo Paolo Senese & Simona De Stefano & Chi Kwan Chau, 2021. "Effects of Evocative Audio-Visual Installations on the Restorativeness in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Steffen Andreas Schüle & Sarah Nanninga & Stefanie Dreger & Gabriele Bolte, 2018. "Relations between Objective and Perceived Built Environments and the Modifying Role of Individual Socioeconomic Position. A Cross-Sectional Study on Traffic Noise and Urban Green Space in a Large Germ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11717-:d:917280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.