IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11478-d913029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Criteria Approach to Assess the Performance of the Brazilian Unified Health System

Author

Listed:
  • Renan Felinto de Farias Aires

    (Department of Applied Social Sciences, Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid, Mossoró 59625-900, Brazil)

  • Camila Cristina Rodrigues Salgado

    (Department of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, Bananeiras 58051-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Brazil’s Unified Health System (SUS) provides universal free access to health services and is considered a model for the rest of the world. One of the tools used by the Brazilian government to assess this system is the Index of Unified Health System Performance (IDSUS). However, this method has a number of limitations, such as disregarding the opinion of healthcare decision makers. Thus, the aim of the present study was to propose a model based on the R-TOPSIS in order to assess the performance of the SUS. Methodologically, the main steps for proposing multi-criteria models were followed, and to validate the model, a real case study with a set of six cities (alternatives) of the state of São Paulo was used. The results provide a clearer picture of the differences in terms of potential and obtained access, as well as the effectiveness of health services in the cities analyzed. Likewise, the proposal of integrating multiple criteria as well as considering healthcare decision makers proved to be decisive for the results obtained, even in comparison with the other approaches. It was concluded that the proposed method provides a robust and adequate analysis of health systems performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Renan Felinto de Farias Aires & Camila Cristina Rodrigues Salgado, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Assess the Performance of the Brazilian Unified Health System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11478-:d:913029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Cristina Gramani, 2014. "Inter-Regional Performance of the Public Health System in a High-Inequality Country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, January.
    2. Ann Barcomb & Nicolas Jullien & Patrick Meyer & Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu, 2019. "Integrating Managerial Preferences into the Qualitative Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Team Members," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Sandra Huber & Martin Josef Geiger & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding, pages 95-143, Springer.
    3. Patrícia Varela & Gilberto de Martins & Luiz Fávero, 2010. "Production efficiency and financing of public health: an analysis of small municipalities in the state of São Paulo — Brazil," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 112-123, June.
    4. Adiel Teixeira de Almeida & Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio Cavalcante & Marcelo Hazin Alencar & Rodrigo José Pires Ferreira & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida-Filho & Thalles Vitelli Garcez, 2015. "Multicriteria and Multiobjective Models for Risk, Reliability and Maintenance Decision Analysis," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-17969-8, January.
    5. Cláudia Araújo & Carlos Barros & Peter Wanke, 2014. "Efficiency determinants and capacity issues in Brazilian for-profit hospitals," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 126-138, June.
    6. Macharis, Cathy & Springael, Johan & De Brucker, Klaas & Verbeke, Alain, 2004. "PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 307-317, March.
    7. Dantas, Marina Kolland & Oliveira, Lilian Ribeiro de & Ferolla, Luna Marquez & Paschoalotto, Marco Antônio Catussi & Lopes, José Eduardo Ferreira & Passador, João Luiz & Passador, Claudia Souza, 2017. "Cross-sectoral assessment of public policies in health and the environment: Scenario of the municipalities in the state of Sao Paulo," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 30-39.
    8. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    9. Renan Felinto de Farias Aires & Luciano Ferreira & Afranio Galdino de Araujo & Denis Borenstein, 2018. "Student selection in a Brazilian university: using a multi-criteria method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 528-540, April.
    10. Edwards, Ward & Barron, F. Hutton, 1994. "SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 306-325, December.
    11. Rize Jing & Tingting Xu & Xiaozhen Lai & Elham Mahmoudi & Hai Fang, 2019. "Technical Efficiency of Public and Private Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Hesham K. Alfares & Salih O. Duffuaa, 2016. "Simulation-Based Evaluation of Criteria Rank-Weighting Methods in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 43-61, January.
    13. Mustajoki, Jyri & Hamalainen, Raimo P. & Lindstedt, Mats R.K., 2006. "Using intervals for global sensitivity and worst-case analyses in multiattribute value trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 278-292, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thalles Vitelli Garcez & Helder Tenório Cavalcanti & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2021. "A hybrid decision support model using Grey Relational Analysis and the Additive-Veto Model for solving multicriteria decision-making problems: an approach to supplier selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 199-231, September.
    2. Renan Felinto de Farias Aires & Luciano Ferreira, 2022. "A New Multi-Criteria Approach for Sustainable Material Selection Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Diogo Ferraz & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Patricia Regina Manzine & Herick Fernando Moralles & Paulo César Morceiro & Bruno Guimarães Torres & Mariana Rodrigues Almeida & João Carlos Soares de Mello & Da, 2021. "COVID Health Structure Index: The Vulnerability of Brazilian Microregions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 197-215, November.
    4. A Jessop, 2011. "Using imprecise estimates for weights," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1048-1055, June.
    5. Lucas Borges Leal Da Silva & Evanielle Barbosa Ferreira & Rodrigo José Pires Ferreira & Eduarda Asfora Frej & Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli & Adiel Teixeira De Almeida, 2023. "Paradigms, Methods, and Tools for Multicriteria Decision Models in Sustainable Industry 4.0 Oriented Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Robin C. Van den Honert, 2016. "Improving Decision Making about Natural Disaster Mitigation Funding in Australia—A Framework," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Podinovski, Vladislav V., 2010. "Set choice problems with incomplete information about the preferences of the decision maker," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 371-379, November.
    8. Wu, Shaomin & Wu, Di & Peng, Rui, 2023. "Considering greenhouse gas emissions in maintenance optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1135-1145.
    9. Tom Koch & Mark Ridgley, 2000. "The Condorcet's Jury Theorem in a Bioethical Context: The Dynamics of Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 379-392, September.
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1255-1286 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Ahrens, Heinz & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2007. "Integrating Ecological And Economic Aspects In Land Use Concepts: Some Conclusions From A Regional Land Use Concept For Bayerisches Donauried," 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK 7986, Agricultural Economics Society.
    12. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    13. Jamie P. Monat, 2009. "The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(6), pages 492-508, October.
    14. Yang, Taho & Wen, Yuan-Feng & Wang, Fang-Fang, 2011. "Evaluation of robustness of supply chain information-sharing strategies using a hybrid Taguchi and multiple criteria decision-making method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 458-466, December.
    15. Podinovski, Vladislav V., 2020. "Maximum likelihood solutions for multicriterial choice problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 299-308.
    16. Kavitha, S. & Satheeshkumar, J. & Amudha, T., 2024. "Multi-label feature selection using q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach extended to CODAS," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-173.
    17. Adiel Teixeira Almeida & Eduarda Asfora Frej & Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli, 2021. "Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 7-47, March.
    18. Zhao, Huiru & Li, Bingkang & Lu, Hao & Wang, Xuejie & Li, Hongze & Guo, Sen & Xue, Wanlei & Wang, Yuwei, 2022. "Economy-environment-energy performance evaluation of CCHP microgrid system: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    19. Annika Maren Schneider & Eva-Maria Oppel & Jonas Schreyögg, 2020. "Investigating the link between medical urgency and hospital efficiency – Insights from the German hospital market," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 649-660, December.
    20. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Wells, Peter, 2008. "The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: A PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 384-394, June.
    21. Albadvi, Amir & Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2007. "Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 673-683, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11478-:d:913029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.