IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11305-d910058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of the Knowledge Mapping of Climate Change Communication Research: Basic Status, Research Hotspots, and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Meifen Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ruyin Long

    (School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
    The Institute for Jiangnan Culture, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Shuhan Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xinru Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hong Chen

    (School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
    Institute for National Security and Green Development, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

Abstract

Climate change communication is a crucial strategy for addressing the major challenges of climate change, and the knowledge mapping analysis and overview of it helps to clarify research progress. Based on CiteSpace, 428 pieces of domestic and foreign literature are collected to clarify the basic status of climate change communication research and summarize research hotspots and prospects. The study found that: (1) The earliest traceable English literature on climate change communication appeared in 2000. The number of articles published has risen steadily since 2008, reaching its first peak in 2015. (2) In contrast, research into Chinese climate change communication began late and progressed slowly. The Chinese literature on climate change communication first appeared in 2009. Although domestic research generally continues to pay attention to this phenomenon, there is still room for development compared with international research. (3) The research hotspots for climate change communication are obtained through keyword co-occurrence analysis. Public perceptions of climate change are strongly influenced by political ideology. Since climate change has political attributes, people from different political parties or groups form their views on climate change through identity protection. (4) The research content on climate change communication can be summarized into the following six aspects: the development of climate change communication research; differences in public perceptions of climate change; factors influencing climate change communication; key elements of the climate change communication process; the important role of the media in climate change communication; and effective strategies for climate change communication. Finally, the shortcomings of this study are summarized and future research prospects on climate change communication are put forward from the perspectives of research methods, research contexts, and research paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Meifen Wu & Ruyin Long & Shuhan Yang & Xinru Wang & Hong Chen, 2022. "Evolution of the Knowledge Mapping of Climate Change Communication Research: Basic Status, Research Hotspots, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11305-:d:910058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    2. Ping Xie, 2015. "Study of international anticancer research trends via co-word and document co-citation visualization analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 611-622, October.
    3. Benedikt Becsi & Daniela Hohenwallner-Ries & Torsten Grothmann & Andrea Prutsch & Tobias Huber & Herbert Formayer, 2020. "Towards better informed adaptation strategies: co-designing climate change impact maps for Austrian regions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 393-411, February.
    4. Matthew J. Hornsey & Emily A. Harris & Paul G. Bain & Kelly S. Fielding, 2016. "Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 622-626, June.
    5. Teresa Myers & Matthew Nisbet & Edward Maibach & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2012. "A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 1105-1112, August.
    6. Andrew Jordan & Tim Rayner & Heike Schroeder & Neil Adger & Kevin Anderson & Alice Bows & Corinne Le Qu�r� & Manoj Joshi & Sarah Mander & Nem Vaughan & Lorraine Whitmarsh, 2013. "Going beyond two degrees? The risks and opportunities of alternative options," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 751-769, November.
    7. Kahan, Dan M. & Peters, Ellen & Dawson, Erica Cantrell & Slovic, Paul, 2017. "Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 54-86, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aiste Dirzyte & Vytis Valatka, 2023. "Creative and Happy Individuals Concerned about Climate Change: Evidence Based on the 10th Round of the European Social Survey in 22 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Israel-Javier Juma-Michilena & Maria-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina & Irene Gil-Saura & Sergio Belda-Miquel, 2024. "Pro-environmental behaviours of generation Z: A cross-cultural approach," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(3), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Shakir Ullah & Sergey Barykin & Ma Jianfu & Taher Saifuddin & Mohammed Arshad Khan & Ruben Kazaryan, 2023. "Green Practices in Mega Development Projects of China–Pakistan Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    2. Welsch, Heinz, 2021. "How climate-friendly behavior relates to moral identity and identity-protective cognition: Evidence from the European social surveys," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Samantha K. Stanley & Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong & Zoe Leviston & Iain Walker, 2021. "Acceptance of climate change and climate refugee policy in Australia and New Zealand: The case against political polarisation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Heinz Welsch, 2022. "What shapes cognitions of climate change in Europe? Ideology, morality, and the role of educational attainment," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 386-395, June.
    5. Chengliang Liu & Qinchang Gui, 2016. "Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 159-184, October.
    6. Odou, Philippe & Schill, Marie, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 243-253.
    7. Rosalind Pidcock & Kate Heath & Lydia Messling & Susie Wang & Anna Pirani & Sarah Connors & Adam Corner & Christopher Shaw & Melissa Gomis, 2021. "Evaluating effective public engagement: local stories from a global network of IPCC scientists," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Qibin Chen & Guilian Fan & Wei Na & Jiming Liu & Jianguo Cui & Hongyan Li, 2019. "Past, Present, and Future of Groundwater Remediation Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Kai Hu & Kunlun Qi & Siluo Yang & Shengyu Shen & Xiaoqiang Cheng & Huayi Wu & Jie Zheng & Stephen McClure & Tianxing Yu, 2018. "Identifying the “Ghost City” of domain topics in a keyword semantic space combining citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 1141-1157, March.
    10. Shane P Singh & Meili Swanson, 2017. "How issue frames shape beliefs about the importance of climate change policy across ideological and partisan groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Philippe Odou & Marie Schill, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Post-Print hal-02929920, HAL.
    12. Ting Liu & Nick Shryane & Mark Elliot, 2022. "Attitudes to climate change risk: classification of and transitions in the UK population between 2012 and 2020," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Liping Fu & Zhaohui Sun & Lanping He & Feng Liu & Xiaoli Jing, 2019. "Global Long-Term Care Research: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Seyedmohammadreza Hosseini & Hamed Baziyad & Rasoul Norouzi & Sheida Jabbedari Khiabani & Győző Gidófalvi & Amir Albadvi & Abbas Alimohammadi & Seyedehsan Seyedabrishami, 2021. "Mapping the intellectual structure of GIS-T field (2008–2019): a dynamic co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2667-2688, April.
    15. Joshua A. Basseches & Rebecca Bromley-Trujillo & Maxwell T. Boykoff & Trevor Culhane & Galen Hall & Noel Healy & David J. Hess & David Hsu & Rachel M. Krause & Harland Prechel & J. Timmons Roberts & J, 2022. "Climate policy conflict in the U.S. states: a critical review and way forward," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Yaowu Sun & Yi Zhai, 2018. "Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: a scientometric review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 203-230, July.
    17. Kathryn T. Stevenson & M. Nils Peterson & Howard D. Bondell, 2018. "Developing a model of climate change behavior among adolescents," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 589-603, December.
    18. Haoran Chu & Janet Yang, 2020. "Their Economy and Our Health: Communicating Climate Change to the Divided American Public," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Rui Wang, 2023. "Fintech: from budding to explosion - an overview of the current state of research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 715-755, April.
    20. A. V. Chumachenko & B. G. Kreminskyi & Iu. L. Mosenkis & A. I. Yakimenko, 2020. "Dynamics of topic formation and quantitative analysis of hot trends in physical science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 739-753, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11305-:d:910058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.