IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10407-d893846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturer’s Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Ding

    (Management School, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Instrument of Science & Technology Information, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Zhangping Lu

    (Management School, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Instrument of Science & Technology Information, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Mengfan Jin

    (Department of Architecture, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215127, China)

  • Licheng Sun

    (Management School, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

Carbon emission reduction and achieving carbon neutrality has become an inevitable trend in the sustainable development era. We investigate the manufacturer’s encroachment and carbon emission reduction decisions considering government cap-and-trade regulations and consumers’ low-carbon preference. The equilibrium decisions for the four scenarios are analytically obtained and compared based using the Stackelberg game. A comparison with and without cap-and-trade regulation under two encroachment decisions regarding member’s profits and carbon emission reduction levels are conducted. It is shown that the encroachment decision is always advantageous for the manufacturer if the government decides not to implement cap-and-trade regulation, and the retailer always loses profit. Moreover, if the carbon quota is sufficient, cap-and-trade regulation benefits the manufacturer. Otherwise, the manufacturer’s encroachment decision depends on the appropriate initial unit amount of carbon emission and unit carbon price. The retailer’s profit may not always be hurt by the manufacturer’s encroachment with cap-and-trade regulation; unless the unit carbon price exceeds a certain threshold, a higher consumer’s low-carbon preference in the encroachment scenario reduces more carbon emissions than in the no-encroachment scenario for the manufacturer. Further, the rising platform commission rate causes the platform profit to increase first and then decrease; the platform profit will slightly decrease if both products become more substitutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Ding & Zhangping Lu & Mengfan Jin & Licheng Sun, 2022. "Manufacturer’s Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10407-:d:893846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Gangshu (George), 2010. "Channel Selection and Coordination in Dual-Channel Supply Chains," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 22-36.
    2. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Huaming & Gu, Xiaoyu & Shi, Victor & Zhu, Jing, 2021. "How to compete with a supply chain partner: Retailer's store brand vs. manufacturer's encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Raymond Hartman & David Wheeler & Manjula Singh, 1997. "The cost of air pollution abatement," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 759-774.
    4. Ding, Huiping & Zhao, Qilan & An, Zhirong & Tang, Ou, 2016. "Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 191-207.
    5. David F. Drake & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2016. "Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 1006-1025, June.
    6. Xianjun Geng & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Lai Wei, 2018. "How Add†on Pricing Interacts with Distribution Contracts," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 605-623, April.
    7. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun, 2022. "Impacts of Supply Chain Competition on Firms’ Carbon Emission Reduction and Social Welfare under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Xu, Xiaoping & Zhang, Mengying & Chen, Lai & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "The region-cap allocation and delivery time decision in the marketplace mode under the cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    10. Wittneben, Bettina B.F., 2009. "Exxon is right: Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2462-2464, June.
    11. Yugang Yu & Xue Li & Xiaoping Xu, 2022. "Reselling or marketplace mode for an online platform: the choice between cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 293-329, March.
    12. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Ji, Jingna & Zhang, Zhiyong & Yang, Lei, 2017. "Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 68-84.
    14. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Zhang, Shanshan, 2021. "Channel addition from marketplace or reselling under regional carbon cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. Qi Qi & Jing Wang & Jianteng Xu, 2018. "A Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Ting Ji & Xiaoping Xu & Xiaoming Yan & Yugang Yu, 2020. "The production decisions and cap setting with wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 128-147, January.
    17. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    18. Yifei Hua & Feng Dong, 2019. "China’s Carbon Market Development and Carbon Market Connection: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Krishnan S. Anand & François C. Giraud-Carrier, 2020. "Pollution Regulation of Competitive Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4193-4206, September.
    20. Carrillo, Janice E. & Vakharia, Asoo J. & Wang, Ruoxuan, 2014. "Environmental implications for online retailing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 744-755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weihao Wang & Deqing Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2023. "Study of Carbon Reduction and Marketing Decisions with the Envisioning of a Favorable Event under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Yan Zhou & Haiying Zhou, 2024. "The Emission Reduction Technology Decision of the Port Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Sebastjan Lazar & Vojko Potočan & Dorota Klimecka-Tatar & Matevz Obrecht, 2022. "Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Fei Wang & Dalin Zhang, 2022. "Effects of a Mixed Emissions Control Policy on the Manufacturer’s Production and Carbon Abatement Investment Decisions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Shuiwang Zhang & Jingcheng Ding & Qianlan Ding, 2023. "Retailer-Led Low-Carbon Supply Chain Coordination Considering Sales Effort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Kaiying & Guo, Qiang & Xu, Yuqiu, 2023. "Information sharing and carbon reduction strategies with extreme weather in the platform economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Xu, Xiaoping & Chen, Xinyang & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2024. "Platform financing versus bank financing: “When to choose which” for green production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 515-532.
    3. Luo, Huajiang & Niu, Baozhuang, 2022. "Impact of competition type on a competitive manufacturer's preference of decision timing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Xu, Xiaoping & Yang, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Juzhi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Live streaming platform operations and coordination under the cap-and-trade regulation: Platform-enabled mode versus platform-agency mode," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Xu, Xiaoping & Zhang, Mengying & Chen, Lai & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "The region-cap allocation and delivery time decision in the marketplace mode under the cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Zhang, Xuefeng & Li, Zhe & Li, Guo, 2024. "Grandfather-based or benchmark-based: Strategy choice for carbon quota allocation methods in the carbon neutrality era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Huaming & Gu, Xiaoyu & Shi, Victor & Zhu, Jing, 2021. "How to compete with a supply chain partner: Retailer's store brand vs. manufacturer's encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Wang, Xinyu & Sethi, Suresh P. & Chang, Shuhua, 2022. "Pollution abatement using cap-and-trade in a dynamic supply chain and its coordination," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Qian Zhang & Yunjia Wang & Lu Liu, 2023. "Carbon Tax or Low-Carbon Subsidy? Carbon Reduction Policy Options under CCUS Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    12. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Yuqiu & Hua, Ye & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2023. "Supplier or co-optor: Optimal channel and logistics selection problems on retail platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 971-988.
    14. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    15. Yingxiao Li & Jianheng Zhou, 2023. "Modeling the relationship between fairness concern and customer loyalty in dual distribution channel," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Matsui, Kenji, 2016. "Asymmetric product distribution between symmetric manufacturers using dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 646-657.
    17. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    18. Xue, Musen & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2020. "Quantity decision timing with spillover effect and asymmetric demand information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Balasubramanian, Ganesh & Ponnachiyur Maruthasalam, Arulanantha Prabu, 2021. "Substitution effect of retailer store brand and manufacturer encroachment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    20. Zhang, Jianqiang & Cao, Qingning & He, Xiuli, 2020. "Manufacturer encroachment with advertising," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10407-:d:893846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.