IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9299-d875442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Requirements for Drone Operations to Minimise Community Noise Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Ramos-Romero

    (Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK)

  • Nathan Green

    (Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK)

  • Seth Roberts

    (Hayes McKenzie Partnership Ltd., Unit 3 Oakridge Office Park, Salisbury SP5 3HT, UK)

  • Charlotte Clark

    (Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK)

  • Antonio J. Torija

    (Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK)

Abstract

The number of applications for drones under R&D have growth significantly during the last few years; however, the wider adoption of these technologies requires ensuring public trust and acceptance. Noise has been identified as one of the key concerns for public acceptance. Although substantial research has been carried out to better understand the sound source generation mechanisms in drones, important questions remain about the requirements for operational procedures and regulatory frameworks. An important issue is that drones operate within different airspace, closer to communities than conventional aircraft, and that the noise produced is highly tonal and contains a greater proportion of high-frequency broadband noise compared with typical aircraft noise. This is likely to cause concern for exposed communities due to impacts on public health and well-being. This paper presents a modelling framework for setting recommendations for drone operations to minimise community noise impact. The modelling framework is based on specific noise targets, e.g., the guidelines at a receiver position defined by WHO for sleep quality inside a residential property. The main assumption is that the estimation of drone noise exposure indoors is highly relevant for informing operational constraints to minimise noise annoyance and sleep disturbance. This paper illustrates the applicability of the modelling framework with a case study, where maximum A-weighted sound pressure levels L A m a x and sound exposure levels S E L as received in typical indoor environments are used to define drone-façade minimum distance to meet WHO recommendations. The practical and scalable capabilities of this modelling framework make it a useful tool for inferring and assessing the impact of drone noise through compliance with appropriate guideline noise criteria. It is considered that with further refinement, this modelling framework could prove to be a significant tool in assisting with the development of noise metrics, regulations specific to drone operations and the assessment of future drone operations and associated noise.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Ramos-Romero & Nathan Green & Seth Roberts & Charlotte Clark & Antonio J. Torija, 2022. "Requirements for Drone Operations to Minimise Community Noise Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9299-:d:875442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathias Basner & Sarah McGuire, 2018. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Effects on Sleep," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-45, March.
    2. Antonio J. Torija & Rory K. Nicholls, 2022. "Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. C. T. Justine Hui & Michael J. Kingan & Yusuke Hioka & Gian Schmid & George Dodd & Kim N. Dirks & Shaun Edlin & Sean Mascarenhas & Young-Min Shim, 2021. "Quantification of the Psychoacoustic Effect of Noise from Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Antonio J. Torija & Charlotte Clark, 2021. "A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Beat Schäffer & Reto Pieren & Kurt Heutschi & Jean Marc Wunderli & Stefan Becker, 2021. "Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio J. Torija & Rory K. Nicholls, 2022. "Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Jianwei Sun & Koichi Yonezawa & Eiji Shima & Hao Liu, 2023. "Integrated Evaluation of the Aeroacoustics and Psychoacoustics of a Single Propeller," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Ricardo Moreno & Francesco Bianco & Stefano Carpita & Alessandro Monticelli & Luca Fredianelli & Gaetano Licitra, 2023. "Adjusted Controlled Pass-By (CPB) Method for Urban Road Traffic Noise Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Jingyi Wang & Chen Weng & Zhen Wang & Chunming Li & Tingting Wang, 2022. "What Constitutes the High-Quality Soundscape in Human Habitats? Utilizing a Random Forest Model to Explore Soundscape and Its Geospatial Factors Behind," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Dominik Hauptvogel & Susanne Bartels & Dirk Schreckenberg & Tobias Rothmund, 2021. "Aircraft Noise Distribution as a Fairness Dilemma—A Review of Aircraft Noise through the Lens of Social Justice Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Tran Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen & Bach Lien Trieu & Thu Lan Nguyen & Makoto Morinaga & Yasuhiro Hiraguri & Takashi Morihara & Yosiaki Sasazawa & Tri Quang Hung Nguyen & Takashi Yano, 2023. "Models of Aviation Noise Impact in the Context of Operation Decrease at Tan Son Nhat Airport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Myriam Tobollik & Matthias Hintzsche & Jördis Wothge & Thomas Myck & Dietrich Plass, 2019. "Burden of Disease Due to Traffic Noise in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Owen Douglas & Enda Murphy, 2020. "Assessing the Treatment of Potential Effect Modifiers Informing World Health Organisation Guidelines for Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Davide Petri & Gaetano Licitra & Maria Angela Vigotti & Luca Fredianelli, 2021. "Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Elisa Bustaffa & Olivia Curzio & Gabriele Donzelli & Francesca Gorini & Nunzia Linzalone & Marco Redini & Fabrizio Bianchi & Fabrizio Minichilli, 2022. "Risk Associations between Vehicular Traffic Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Residential Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Hener, Timo, 2022. "Noise pollution and violent crime☆," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Kähler, Svantje T. & Abben, Thomas & Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles & Tomat, Miriam & Jacobsen, Thomas, 2022. "An assessment of the acceptance and aesthetics of UAVs and helicopters through an experiment and a survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Haibo Wang & Zhipeng Wu & Xiaolin Yan & Jincai Chen, 2023. "Impact Evaluation of Network Structure Differentiation on Traffic Noise during Road Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Hajdu, Tamás, 2024. "Temperature exposure and sleep duration: Evidence from time use surveys," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    18. Irene van Kamp & Sendrick Simon & Hilary Notley & Christos Baliatsas & Elise van Kempen, 2020. "Evidence Relating to Environmental Noise Exposure and Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Cardio-Vascular and Metabolic Health Outcomes in the Context of IGCB (N): A Scoping Review of New Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Jing Ma & Chunjiang Li & Mei-Po Kwan & Yanwei Chai, 2018. "A Multilevel Analysis of Perceived Noise Pollution, Geographic Contexts and Mental Health in Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Janice Hegewald & Melanie Schubert & Alice Freiberg & Karla Romero Starke & Franziska Augustin & Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Hajo Zeeb & Andreas Seidler, 2020. "Traffic Noise and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9299-:d:875442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.