IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p8984-d870098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Across-Shift Changes in Viable Nasal Bacteria among Waste-Incineration Plant Workers—A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Cyprowski

    (Biohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk

    (Biohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agata Stobnicka-Kupiec

    (Biohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak

    (Biohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Rafał L. Górny

    (Biohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the time-related changes in viable nasal bacteria concentrations among waste-incineration plant (WIP) workers compared to a group of office building (OB) workers outside the plant. In total, 20 volunteers participated in the study, including 14 WIP and 6 OB workers. WIP workers were divided into two sub-groups: supervisory staff (SVS) and maintenance and repair workers (MRW). Nasal swabs were collected before and after the morning work shift. Airborne bacteria were sampled with a six-stage impactor to assess the bioaerosol size distribution. The analysis showed that a significant, almost three-fold increase in nasal bacterial concentration was found only among WIP workers, and this referred mainly to anaerobic species. The load of anaerobic bacteria at the beginning of work was 12,988 CFU/mL, and after work shift 36,979 CFU/mL ( p < 0.01). Significant increases in microbial concentrations was found only in the MRW subgroup, among non-smoking workers only. The results showed increased bacterial concentration in WIP nasal samples for as many as 12 bacterial species, including, e.g., Streptococcus constellatus , Peptostreptococcus spp., E. coli , and P. mirabilis . These preliminary data confirmed that the nasal swab method was helpful for assessment of the workers’ real-time exposure to airborne bacteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Cyprowski & Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk & Agata Stobnicka-Kupiec & Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak & Rafał L. Górny, 2022. "Across-Shift Changes in Viable Nasal Bacteria among Waste-Incineration Plant Workers—A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:8984-:d:870098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/8984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/8984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Sohrab Hossain & Nik Norulaini Nik Ab Rahman & Venugopal Balakrishnan & Vignesh R. Puvanesuaran & Md. Zaidul Islam Sarker & Mohd Omar Ab Kadir, 2013. "Infectious Risk Assessment of Unsafe Handling Practices and Management of Clinical Solid Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navarro Ferronato & Vincenzo Torretta, 2019. "Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:8984-:d:870098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.