IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p8922-d869294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Care via Video Consultations: Piloting and S.W.O.T. Analysis of a Family Medicine Digitally Synchronous Seminar for Medical Students

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Särchen

    (Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

  • Susanne Springborn

    (Allgemeinmedizin Breckenheim, 65207 Wiesbaden, Germany)

  • Achim Mortsiefer

    (Chair of General Practice II and Patient-Centeredness in Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

  • Jan Ehlers

    (Didactics and Education Research in the Health Sector, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany)

Abstract

Background: There is a need to familiarize medical students with the specifics of video consultations. This paper presents the concept and tests of a digitally synchronous distance seminar in which medical students practice video consultations as an aid to a family physician’s activity in a patient-oriented manner. The aim of the evaluation was to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (S.W.O.T.) of the teaching concept. Methods: A total of 12 students carried out video consultations independently and under medical supervision. The seminar included two elements: (A) All students and teachers were video consulted in a family practice; (B) A small group performed a video consultation in a patient´s home environment. The students’ evaluation was conducted with two questionnaires (pre/post), which were analyzed with descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. The S.W.O.T. analysis was elaborated by the author team based on the results of the questionnaires and the interviews with the teachers. Results: Students learned the limits and possibilities of teleconsultations and deepened their family medical knowledge. Strengths: Among others; increase interest in video consultations, patient contact, focused work. Weaknesses: Among others; technical difficulties and the time it requires. Opportunities: Among others; involve students with multiple workloads in patient teaching. Risks: Among others; no integration into the curriculum yet, few personnel resources. Conclusions: The learning model familiarizes medical students with competences in family medical patient care using video communication. The results of S.W.O.T. analyses can be weighted differently. Project groups can decide individually if they want to integrate the learning concept into their curriculum and which further improvements are necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Särchen & Susanne Springborn & Achim Mortsiefer & Jan Ehlers, 2022. "Patient Care via Video Consultations: Piloting and S.W.O.T. Analysis of a Family Medicine Digitally Synchronous Seminar for Medical Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:8922-:d:869294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/8922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/8922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez & Diego Ruiz-Salvador & María del Mar Rodríguez Salvador & Mercedes Pérez-Heredia & Francisco José Muñoz Ronda & Oscar Arrogante, 2020. "Consensus on Criteria for Good Practices in Video Consultation: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:8922-:d:869294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.