IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8788-d866402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits and Risks of Sharing Genomic Data for Research: Comparing the Views of Rare Disease Patients, Informal Carers and Healthcare Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Amorim

    (Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
    EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal)

  • Susana Silva

    (Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
    Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Helena Machado

    (Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Elisa Leão Teles

    (Centro de Referência de Doenças Hereditárias do Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Maria João Baptista

    (Centro de Referência de Cardiopatias Congénitas, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    Departamento de Ginecologia, Obstetrícia e Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Tiago Maia

    (Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
    EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ngozi Nwebonyi

    (Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
    EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal)

  • Cláudia de Freitas

    (Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
    EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
    Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Assessing public and patients’ expectations and concerns about genomic data sharing is essential to promote adequate data governance and engagement in rare diseases genomics research. This cross-sectional study compared the views of 159 rare disease patients, 478 informal carers and 63 healthcare professionals in Northern Portugal about the benefits and risks of sharing genomic data for research, and its associated factors. The three participant groups expressed significantly different views. The majority of patients (84.3%) and informal carers (87.4%) selected the discovery of a cure for untreatable diseases as the most important benefit. In contrast, most healthcare professionals revealed a preference for the development of new drugs and treatments (71.4%), which was the second most selected benefit by carers (48.3%), especially by the more educated (OR (95% CI): 1.58 (1.07–2.34)). Lack of security and control over information access and the extraction of information exceeding research objectives were the two most often selected risks by patients (72.6% and 50.3%, respectively) and carers (60.0% and 60.6%, respectively). Conversely, professionals were concerned with genomic data being used to discriminate citizens (68.3%), followed by the extraction of information exceeding research objectives (54.0%). The latter risk was more frequently expressed by more educated carers (OR (95% CI): 1.60 (1.06–2.41)) and less by those with blue-collar (OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.25–0.77) and other occupations (OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.26–0.74)). Developing communication strategies and consent approaches tailored to participants’ expectations and needs can benefit the inclusiveness of genomics research that is key for patient-centred care.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Amorim & Susana Silva & Helena Machado & Elisa Leão Teles & Maria João Baptista & Tiago Maia & Ngozi Nwebonyi & Cláudia de Freitas, 2022. "Benefits and Risks of Sharing Genomic Data for Research: Comparing the Views of Rare Disease Patients, Informal Carers and Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8788-:d:866402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rita Francisco & Sandra Brasil & Carlota Pascoal & Andrew C. Edmondson & Jaak Jaeken & Paula A. Videira & Cláudia de Freitas & Vanessa dos Reis Ferreira & Dorinda Marques-da-Silva, 2022. "A Community-Led Approach as a Guide to Overcome Challenges for Therapy Research in Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Mendes, Álvaro & Sousa, Liliana & Sequeiros, Jorge & Clarke, Angus, 2017. "Discredited legacy: Stigma and familial amyloid polyneuropathy in Northwestern Portugal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-80.
    3. Serapioni, Mauro & Matos, Ana Raquel, 2014. "Citizen participation and discontent in three Southern European health systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 226-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luisi, Daniela & Hämel, Kerstin, 2021. "Community participation and empowerment in primary health care in Emilia-Romagna: A document analysis study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 177-184.
    2. Diene Monique Carlos & Elisabete Matallo Marchesini de Pádua & Lygia Maria Pereira da Silva & Marta Angélica Iossi Silva & Walter Ernesto Ude Marques & Maria Neto da Cruz Leitão & Maria das Graças Car, 2017. "The care network of the families involved in violence against children and adolescents: the Primary Health Care perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2452-2467, August.
    3. Ummugulsum Aysan, 2021. "The Welfare States and Happiness Inequalities in Europe," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(81), pages 71-99, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8788-:d:866402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.