IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8569-d862262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Perinatal Loss Nursing Simulation among Undergraduate Students

Author

Listed:
  • Sook Jung Kang

    (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea)

  • Yoonjung Kim

    (College of Nursing, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea)

Abstract

Providing careful and proper care for women experiencing perinatal loss is essential. Nurses and nursing students must be sufficiently prepared to provide adequate care. Caring for women who experienced a perinatal loss requires special education and instruction, but little is provided to nursing students. This study aimed to investigate the impact of simulation education directed toward caring for women with perinatal loss. A single-group pretest posttest study design was adopted. A convenience sample of 77 undergraduate students participated in the study. The nursing students’ nursing anxiety, confidence for clinical decision-making, communication competence, and simulative effectiveness were measured before and after the simulation. In addition, we asked students open-ended questions. No significant differences were noted in variables. However, the rank order of simulation effectiveness and result of open-ended questions had some noteworthy implications. Although there was no significant effect in results, simulation education about the perinatal loss was helpful for nursing students. Nursing students reflected on perinatal loss situation and learned that they should provide empathetical therapeutic communication based on needs of women with perinatal loss. To assure its effectiveness and to include optimal program content, a need exists to measure student reflection before and after the simulation. To fully guide and support women and their families with perinatal loss, providing standardized care is needed and in order to do that, standard for educational program regarding perinatal loss needs to be developed and delivered to nursing students as well as nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Sook Jung Kang & Yoonjung Kim, 2022. "The Impact of Perinatal Loss Nursing Simulation among Undergraduate Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-10, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8569-:d:862262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steinberg, Julia R. & Tschann, Jeanne M. & Furgerson, Dorothy & Harper, Cynthia C., 2016. "Psychosocial factors and pre-abortion psychological health: The significance of stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 67-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Taehyun & Steinberg, Julia R., 2023. "Individual changes in abortion knowledge and attitudes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    2. Rocca, Corinne H. & Samari, Goleen & Foster, Diana G. & Gould, Heather & Kimport, Katrina, 2020. "Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: An examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. PettyJohn, Morgan E. & Reid, Taylor A. & Miller, Elizabeth & Bogen, Katherine W. & McCauley, Heather L., 2021. "Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and pregnancy risk among adolescent women with a history of foster care involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8569-:d:862262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.