IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8567-d862185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Educational Interventions on Individual Cognition of Garbage Classification Based on EEG Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Zhao

    (Faculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Xinyun Ren

    (Faculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Yan Liu

    (Faculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Yujun Li

    (Department of Foreign Language and Culture, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China)

  • Ruyin Long

    (School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

Abstract

Improvement in an individuals’ cognition is the key to promote garbage classification. This study takes university students as the research subjects, through three educational interventions, including the self-learning, heuristic learning, and interactive learning ways, to seek the most effective intervention based upon event-related potentials (ERPs) that is beneficial to enhance cognition of garbage classification. The results show that the experimental subjects induced P300 and LPP components, representing attentional changes and cognitive conflicts in classification judgments. There are differences in the amplitudes and peak latency of the two components corresponding to different interventions, indicating that the three educational interventions are able to improve the individual’s cognition level of garbage classification within a certain period of time. The interactive-learning intervention triggers the largest amplitudes of P300 and LPP, as well as the smallest peak latency, indicating its effect is the best. Such results provide insight into the design for an appropriate strategy in garbage classification education. The study also shows that an EEG signal can be used as the endogenous neural indicator to measure the performance of garbage classification under different educational interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Zhao & Xinyun Ren & Yan Liu & Yujun Li & Ruyin Long, 2022. "Different Educational Interventions on Individual Cognition of Garbage Classification Based on EEG Monitoring," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8567-:d:862185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moh, YiingChiee & -->Abd Manaf, Latifah, 2017. "Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Junjun Zheng & Mingyuan Xu & Ming Cai & Zhichao Wang & Mingmiao Yang, 2019. "Modeling Group Behavior to Study Innovation Diffusion Based on Cognition and Network: An Analysis for Garbage Classification System in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Shanshan Wu & Hongqing Ji & Junyeon Won & Xiaolong Liu & Jung-Jun Park, 2021. "Effects of Acute Visual Stimulation Exercise on Attention Processes: An ERP Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Wanglin Ma & Zhongkun Zhu, 2021. "Internet use and willingness to participate in garbage classification: an investigation of Chinese residents," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9), pages 788-793, May.
    5. Rui Zhao & Meng Yang & Jianxiao Liu & Linchuan Yang & Zhikang Bao & Xinyun Ren, 2020. "University Students’ Purchase Intention and Willingness to Pay for Carbon-Labeled Food Products: A Purchase Decision-Making Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Herbes, Carsten & Friege, Christian & Baldo, Davide & Mueller, Kai-Markus, 2015. "Willingness to pay lip service? Applying a neuroscience-based method to WTP for green electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 562-572.
    7. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & Ho, Manh-Toan & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Vuong, Thu-Trang & Khuc, Quy & Ho, Hoang-Anh & La, Viet-Phuong, 2021. "On the environment-destructive probabilistic trends: A perceptual and behavioral study on video game players," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Yixuan Wang & Xingle Long & Liang Li & Qinglin Wang & Xiping Ding & Sijia Cai, 2021. "Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: the moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7230-7250, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    2. Shraddha Yadav & Yingjiao Xu & Helmut Hergeth, 2024. "Walking the Talk: Unraveling the Influence of the Sustainability Features of Leather Alternatives on Consumer Behavior toward Running Shoes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Noorita Mohammad & Basri Badyalina & Shahira Ariffin & Nani Ilyana Syafie & Intan Syafinas Mat Shafie & Khamisah Abd Manaf, 2024. "Young People's Involvement in Reused Cooking Oil," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 19-27.
    4. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2021. "Video games and scientific research," OSF Preprints cj593, Center for Open Science.
    5. Dingde Xu & Chen Qing & Yang Chen & Jia He & Fengwan Zhang, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Rural Human Settlements in the Information Age: Can Internet Use Drive Farmers to Participate in Garbage Classification?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Han, Myat Su & Chen, Weiming, 2021. "Determinants of eco-innovation adoption of small and medium enterprises: An empirical analysis in Myanmar," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Beixun Huang & Haijun Li & Zeying Huang & Jiazhang Huang & Junmao Sun, 2022. "Sustainable Healthy Diets and Demand for the Front-of-Package Labeling: Evidence from Consumption of Fresh Pork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Daniel Adu Ankrah & Bright Owusu Asante & Stephen Prah & Forster K. Boateng, 2024. "Impact of digital financial inclusion on the participation in farmer‐based organisations, structured market and off‐farm work in Ghana," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1254-1273, March.
    10. Carsten Herbes & Johannes Dahlin & Peter Kurz, 2020. "Consumer Willingness To Pay for Proenvironmental Attributes of Biogas Digestate-Based Potting Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Khuc, Quy Van, 2021. "A new hierarchy of human motives updates environmental culture thoughts," OSF Preprints vx69u, Center for Open Science.
    12. Xuemeng Zhang & Chao Liu & Yuexi Chen & Guanghong Zheng & Yinguang Chen, 2022. "Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11471-11513, October.
    13. Tetiana Yanchuk & Olga Fedchenko, 2022. "Use Of Neuromarketing Tools During The Pandemic," Three Seas Economic Journal, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 3(2).
    14. Liping Ding & Fan Zhang & Jing Shuai, 2018. "How Do Chinese Residents Expect of Government Subsidies on Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation?—A Case of Wuhan, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Natasha Juliana & Suddin Lada & Brahim Chekima & Azaze-Azizi Abdul Adis, 2022. "Exploring Determinants Shaping Recycling Behavior Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model: An Empirical Study of Households in Sabah, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Jingyang Duan & Mingyang Zhang & Baodong Cheng, 2023. "Study on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions for Carbon-Labeled Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Le, Tam-Tri & Jones, Thomas & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "The crucial roles of biodiversity loss belief and perception in urban residents’ consumption attitude and behavior towards animal-based products," OSF Preprints b8pgu, Center for Open Science.
    18. Khuc, Quy Van, 2021. "Questioning in the 3D-Mindsponge-Serendipity (3DMS) system," OSF Preprints uz2yn, Center for Open Science.
    19. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & MacDonald, Scott & Boutin, Nathalie & Bigerna, Simona, 2020. "Are voluntary markets effective in replacing state-led support for the expansion of renewables? – A comparative analysis of voluntary green electricity markets in the UK, Germany, France and Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Gorin, Aleksei & Nedelko, Anastasia & Kosonogov, Vladimir & Vakhviyainen, Maria & Tugin, Sergey & Moiseeva, Victoria & Klucharev, Vasily & Shestakova, Anna, 2022. "N400 correlate of brand associations," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8567-:d:862185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.