IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8544-d861536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Narrative Literature Review of Natural Language Processing Applied to the Occupational Exposome

Author

Listed:
  • Annika M. Schoene

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Ioannis Basinas

    (Department of Health Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Martie van Tongeren

    (Department of Health Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Sophia Ananiadou

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

The evolution of the Exposome concept revolutionised the research in exposure assessment and epidemiology by introducing the need for a more holistic approach on the exploration of the relationship between the environment and disease. At the same time, further and more dramatic changes have also occurred on the working environment, adding to the already existing dynamic nature of it. Natural Language Processing (NLP) refers to a collection of methods for identifying, reading, extracting and untimely transforming large collections of language. In this work, we aim to give an overview of how NLP has successfully been applied thus far in Exposome research. Methods: We conduct a literature search on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for scientific articles published between 2011 and 2021. We use both quantitative and qualitative methods to screen papers and provide insights into the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We outline our approach for article selection and provide an overview of our findings. This is followed by a more detailed insight into selected articles. Results: Overall, 6420 articles were screened for the suitability of this review, where we review 37 articles in depth. Finally, we discuss future avenues of research and outline challenges in existing work. Conclusions: Our results show that (i) there has been an increase in articles published that focus on applying NLP to exposure and epidemiology research, (ii) most work uses existing NLP tools and (iii) traditional machine learning is the most popular approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Annika M. Schoene & Ioannis Basinas & Martie van Tongeren & Sophia Ananiadou, 2022. "A Narrative Literature Review of Natural Language Processing Applied to the Occupational Exposome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8544-:d:861536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Schultheisz, 1981. "TOXLINE: Evolution of an online interactive bibliographic database," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 32(6), pages 421-429, November.
    2. Arun Varghese & Michelle Cawley & Tao Hong, 2018. "Supervised clustering for automated document classification and prioritization: a case study using toxicological abstracts," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 398-414, September.
    3. Christine C. Ekenga & Cora-Ann McElwain & Nadav Sprague, 2018. "Examining Public Perceptions about Lead in School Drinking Water: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Twitter Response to an Environmental Health Hazard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth C. Christenson & Ryan Cronk & Helen Atkinson & Aayush Bhatt & Emilio Berdiel & Michelle Cawley & Grace Cho & Collin Knox Coleman & Cailee Harrington & Kylie Heilferty & Don Fejfar & Emily J., 2021. "Evidence Map and Systematic Review of Disinfection Efficacy on Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Darcy M. Anderson & Ryan Cronk & Donald Fejfar & Emily Pak & Michelle Cawley & Jamie Bartram, 2021. "Safe Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Review on the Costs of Establishing and Maintaining Environmental Health in Facilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Ana Reyes-Menendez & José Ramón Saura & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter: A Topic-Based Sentiment Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Tie Hua Zhou & Gong Liang Hu & Ling Wang, 2019. "Psychological Disorder Identifying Method Based on Emotion Perception over Social Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Bhavna Singichetti & Adam Dodd & Jamie L. Conklin & Kristen Hassmiller Lich & Nasim S. Sabounchi & Rebecca B. Naumann, 2022. "Trends and Insights from Transportation Congestion Pricing Policy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Ying Wang & Peiwen Luo, 2022. "Exploring the Needs of Elderly Care in China from Family Caregivers’ Perspective via Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Nadav L. Sprague & Isabel B. Fan & Michelle Dandeneau & Jorge Fabian Hernandez Perez & Jordyn Birmingham & Daritza Los Santos & Milan I. Riddick & Gabriella Y. Meltzer & Eva L. Siegel & Diana Hernánde, 2024. "StreetTalk: exploring energy insecurity in New York City using a novel street intercept interview and social media dissemination method," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Nadav L. Sprague & Ashby L. Sachs & Christine C. Ekenga, 2022. "Green vs. Screen: Exploring the Outcomes of an In-Person and Virtual Nature-Based Environmental Education Intervention for Low-Income Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8544-:d:861536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.