IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i1p162-d127872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Public Perceptions about Lead in School Drinking Water: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Twitter Response to an Environmental Health Hazard

Author

Listed:
  • Christine C. Ekenga

    (Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)

  • Cora-Ann McElwain

    (Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)

  • Nadav Sprague

    (Gateway to the Great Outdoors, Chicago, IL 60613, USA)

Abstract

Exposure to lead has long been a community health concern in St. Louis, Missouri. The objective of this study was to examine public response to reports of elevated lead levels in school drinking water in St. Louis, Missouri via Twitter, a microblogging platform with over 320 million active users. We used a mixed-methods design to examine Twitter user status updates, known as “tweets,” from 18 August to 31 December 2016. The number of tweets each day was recorded, and Twitter users were classified into five user types (General Public, Journalist/News, Health Professional/Academic, Politician/Government Official, and Non-Governmental Organization). A total of 492 tweets were identified during the study period. The majority of discourse on Twitter occurred during the two-week period after initial media reports and was driven by members of the General Public. Thematic analysis of tweets revealed four themes: Information Sharing, Health Concerns, Sociodemographic Disparities, and Outrage. Twitter users characterized lead in school drinking water as an issue of environmental inequity. The findings of this study provide evidence that social media platforms can be utilized as valuable tools for public health researchers and practitioners to gauge public sentiment about environmental health issues, identify emerging community concerns, and inform future communication and research strategies regarding environmental health hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine C. Ekenga & Cora-Ann McElwain & Nadav Sprague, 2018. "Examining Public Perceptions about Lead in School Drinking Water: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Twitter Response to an Environmental Health Hazard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:162-:d:127872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/1/162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/1/162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kui Liu & Li Li & Tao Jiang & Bin Chen & Zhenggang Jiang & Zhengting Wang & Yongdi Chen & Jianmin Jiang & Hua Gu, 2016. "Chinese Public Attention to the Outbreak of Ebola in West Africa: Evidence from the Online Big Data Platform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Wang & Peiwen Luo, 2022. "Exploring the Needs of Elderly Care in China from Family Caregivers’ Perspective via Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Nadav L. Sprague & Ashby L. Sachs & Christine C. Ekenga, 2022. "Green vs. Screen: Exploring the Outcomes of an In-Person and Virtual Nature-Based Environmental Education Intervention for Low-Income Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Ana Reyes-Menendez & José Ramón Saura & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter: A Topic-Based Sentiment Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Tie Hua Zhou & Gong Liang Hu & Ling Wang, 2019. "Psychological Disorder Identifying Method Based on Emotion Perception over Social Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Annika M. Schoene & Ioannis Basinas & Martie van Tongeren & Sophia Ananiadou, 2022. "A Narrative Literature Review of Natural Language Processing Applied to the Occupational Exposome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Nadav L. Sprague & Isabel B. Fan & Michelle Dandeneau & Jorge Fabian Hernandez Perez & Jordyn Birmingham & Daritza Los Santos & Milan I. Riddick & Gabriella Y. Meltzer & Eva L. Siegel & Diana Hernánde, 2024. "StreetTalk: exploring energy insecurity in New York City using a novel street intercept interview and social media dissemination method," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangkun Huang & Xiaoping Xu & Sini Su, 2021. "Diverging from News Media: An Exploratory Study on the Changing Dynamics between Media and Public Attention on Cancer in China from 2011–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Shaobo Zhong & Zhichen Yu & Wei Zhu, 2019. "Study of the Effects of Air Pollutants on Human Health Based on Baidu Indices of Disease Symptoms and Air Quality Monitoring Data in Beijing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:162-:d:127872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.