IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7676-d845783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole M. Neu-Baker

    (College of Nanoscale Science & Engineering, Nanobioscience Constellation, State University of New York (SUNY) Polytechnic Institute, Albany, NY 12203, USA)

  • Adrienne Eastlake

    (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA)

  • Laura Hodson

    (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA)

Abstract

In collaboration with RTI International, the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) administered a survey to North American companies working with nanomaterials to assess health and safety practices. The results would contribute to understanding the impact of the efforts made by the NIOSH Nanotechnology Research Center (NTRC) in communicating occupational health and safety (OHS) considerations for workers when handling these materials. The survey, developed by RAND Corporation, was conducted online from September 2019–December 2019. Forty-five companies or organizations in the U.S. and Canada that fabricate, manufacture, handle, dispose, or otherwise use nanomaterials completed the survey. The survey was designed to answer research questions regarding the nanomaterials in use, which resources the companies have consulted for OHS guidance, and the overall OHS culture at the companies. Other questions specifically addressed whether the companies interacted with NIOSH or NIOSH resources to inform OHS policies and practices. Among participating companies, 57.8% had a maximum of 50 employees. Gold nanoparticles and polymers were most common (n = 20; 45.5% each), followed by graphene (36.4%), carbon nanotubes and nanofibers (34.1%), and zinc oxide nanoparticles (31.8%). Environmental monitoring was performed by 31.8% of the companies. While 88.9% of the companies had laminar flow cabinets, only 67.5% required it to be used with ENMs. Information and training programs were indicated by 90% of the sample, and only 29.6% performed specific health surveillance for ENM workers. Personal protective equipment primarily included gloves (100%) and eye/face protection (97.7%). More than a third (37.8%) of the respondents reported using at least one NIOSH resource to acquire information about safe handling of ENMs. The small number of companies that responded to and completed the survey is a considerable limitation to this study. However, the survey data are valuable for gauging the reach and influence of the NIOSH NTRC on nano OHS and for informing future outreach, particularly to small businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole M. Neu-Baker & Adrienne Eastlake & Laura Hodson, 2022. "Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7676-:d:845783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivo Iavicoli & Veruscka Leso & Marco Piacci & Dante Luigi Cioffi & Irina Guseva Canu & Paul A. Schulte, 2019. "An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camille Crézé & Marjorie François & Nancy B. Hopf & Victor Dorribo & Jean-Jacques Sauvain & Enrico Bergamaschi & Giacomo Garzaro & Maida Domat & Judith Friesl & Eva Penssler & Athena Progiou & Irina G, 2021. "Producers of Engineered Nanomaterials—What Motivates Company and Worker Participation in Biomonitoring Programs?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7676-:d:845783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.