IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3290-d265079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials

Author

Listed:
  • Ivo Iavicoli

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Veruscka Leso

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Marco Piacci

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Dante Luigi Cioffi

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Irina Guseva Canu

    (Institute for Health and Work (IST), Biopole, Route de la Corniche 2, CH-1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Paul A. Schulte

    (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1150 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-14, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA)

Abstract

The widespread industrial application of nanotechnology has increased the number of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), but it is not clear to what extent prevention guidance is practiced. Our aim was to explore the extent that companies manufacturing and/or using ENMs apply risk assessment and management measures. Thirty-four companies were surveyed with an international 35-item questionnaire investigating company and workforce features, types of ENM handled, and risk evaluation and preventive measures adopted. Among participating companies, 62% had a maximum of 10 employees. Metal-based nanomaterials were most frequently identified (73%). Environmental monitoring was performed by 41% of the companies, while engineering exposure controls were approximately reported by 50%. Information and training programs were indicated by 85% of the sample, only 9% performed specific health surveillance for ENM workers. Personal protective equipment primarily included gloves (100%) and eye/face protection (94%). This small-scale assessment can contribute to the limited amount of published literature on the topic. Future investigations should include a greater number of companies to better represent ENM workplaces and a direct access to industrial settings to collect information on site. Finally, deeper attention should be paid to define standardized frameworks for ENM risk assessment that may guide nano-specific preventive actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivo Iavicoli & Veruscka Leso & Marco Piacci & Dante Luigi Cioffi & Irina Guseva Canu & Paul A. Schulte, 2019. "An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3290-:d:265079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole M. Neu-Baker & Adrienne Eastlake & Laura Hodson, 2022. "Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Camille Crézé & Marjorie François & Nancy B. Hopf & Victor Dorribo & Jean-Jacques Sauvain & Enrico Bergamaschi & Giacomo Garzaro & Maida Domat & Judith Friesl & Eva Penssler & Athena Progiou & Irina G, 2021. "Producers of Engineered Nanomaterials—What Motivates Company and Worker Participation in Biomonitoring Programs?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3290-:d:265079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.