IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7674-d845752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Hartwig

    (Institute of Clinical Physiology IFC-CNR, 56100 Pisa, Italy)

  • Carlo Sansotta

    (Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Maria Sole Morelli

    (Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, 56100 Pisa, Italy)

  • Barbara Testagrossa

    (Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Acri

    (Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) systems are used in academic research laboratories and industrial research fields, besides representing one of the most important imaging modalities in clinical radiology. This technology does not use ionizing radiation, but it cannot be considered without risks. These risks are associated with the working principle of the technique, which mainly involves static magnetic fields that continuously increase—namely, the radiofrequency (RF) field and spatial magnetic field gradient. To prevent electromagnetic hazards, the EU and ICNIRP have defined workers’ exposure limits. Several studies that assess health risks for workers and patients of diagnostic MR are reported in the literature, but data on workers’ risk evaluation using nuclear MR (NMR) spectroscopy are very poor. Therefore, the aim of this research is the risk assessment of an NMR environment, paying particular attention to workers with active implantable medical devices (AIMDs). Our perspective study consisted of the measurement of the static magnetic field around a 300 MHz (7 T) NMR research spectrometer and the computation of the electric field induced by the movements of an operator. None of the calculated exposure parameters exceeded the threshold limits imposed by legislation for protection against short-term effects of acute occupational exposure, but our results revealed that the level of exposure exceeded the action level threshold limit for workers with AIMD during the execution of tasks requiring the closest proximity to the spectrometer. Moreover, the strong dependence of the induced electric field results from the walking speed models is shown. This case study represents a snapshot of the NMR risk assessment with the specific goal to increase the interest in the safety of NMR environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Hartwig & Carlo Sansotta & Maria Sole Morelli & Barbara Testagrossa & Giuseppe Acri, 2022. "Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7674-:d:845752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Acri & Patrizia Inferrera & Lucia Denaro & Carlo Sansotta & Elisa Ruello & Carmelo Anfuso & Francesca Maria Salmeri & Girolamo Garreffa & Giuseppe Vermiglio & Barbara Testagrossa, 2018. "dB/dt Evaluation in MRI Sites: Is ICNIRP Threshold Limit (for Workers) Exceeded?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7674-:d:845752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.