IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i7p1298-d153655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

dB/dt Evaluation in MRI Sites: Is ICNIRP Threshold Limit (for Workers) Exceeded?

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Acri

    (Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Patrizia Inferrera

    (School on Medical Physic, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Lucia Denaro

    (Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Carlo Sansotta

    (Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Elisa Ruello

    (Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Carmelo Anfuso

    (IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98123 Messina, Italy)

  • Francesca Maria Salmeri

    (Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Girolamo Garreffa

    (IEMEST (PA), Fondazione Potito (CB), FISMECO (RM), Via G. Donati, 00159 Roma, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Vermiglio

    (Department of P.A.S.S.I., University of Messina, Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

  • Barbara Testagrossa

    (Department of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy)

Abstract

The Directive 2013/35/EU establishes standards for workers exposed to static and time varying magnetic fields. These limits are based on ICNIRP guidelines expressed in terms of the electric field induced in the body. The complexity of this measurement led to theoretical models being developed. In this study, the experimental evaluation included varying magnetic field exposures for two classes of MRI workers. The measurements are conducted on four different MRI Systems including one 0.35 T, two 1.5 T, and one 3.0 T. Pocket magnetic dosimeters were used and it was carried out during routine conditions, emergency conditions, and cold-head maintenance/substitution. The acquired data has been processed and the corresponding dB/dt curves have been computed as the first time derivative of the dataset. The weighted peak approach was also implemented for the compliance assessment with regulatory limits. The dB/dt peak values have been compared with the reference level (RL) proposed by ICNIRP. The results show that the RL always exceeds during measurements on the 3.0 T scanner and sometimes on 1.5 T. In light of the foregoing, the diffusion of ultra-high field MRI scanners involves the introduction of behavioral rules that could be more useful than a numerical action level.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Acri & Patrizia Inferrera & Lucia Denaro & Carlo Sansotta & Elisa Ruello & Carmelo Anfuso & Francesca Maria Salmeri & Girolamo Garreffa & Giuseppe Vermiglio & Barbara Testagrossa, 2018. "dB/dt Evaluation in MRI Sites: Is ICNIRP Threshold Limit (for Workers) Exceeded?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1298-:d:153655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentina Hartwig & Carlo Sansotta & Maria Sole Morelli & Barbara Testagrossa & Giuseppe Acri, 2022. "Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1298-:d:153655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.