IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7555-d843668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Family Court Judges Theorize about Parental Alienation? A Qualitative Exploration of the Territory

Author

Listed:
  • Telma M. Marques

    (CICPSI, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon|Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Isabel Narciso

    (CICPSI, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon|Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Luana C. Ferreira

    (CICPSI, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon|Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Parental alienation (PA) and its conceptualization or understanding of the process underlying this dynamic has long been controversial, but it has also been frequently brought to courtrooms. This study provides an account of how legal professionals conceptualize “parental alienation” and how they describe the characteristics of the phenomenon. Using a qualitative design, 21 family court judges (range 33–60 years; 11 men and 10 women), working with child custody cases, participated in an individual in-depth interview. A qualitative analysis based on Grounded Theory basic procedures revealed a complex picture of alienation dynamics with five interconnected results. First, PA contexts and landscapes, which included the judges’ perceptions on the PA nurturing contexts, its strategic behavior patterns and functions, portraits of PA and clues for its identification; second, considerations on PA severity; third, the influential factors, including those related to the emergence of PA; fourth, individual and relational impact of being exposed to PA; and fifth, perceived signs of change. The results also allowed for the complexification of the judges’ theories, revealing six properties of the PA concept: elasticity, intentionality and camouflage, power asymmetries, multifactorial nature, and destructiveness. Directions for future research are expanded from these results and pragmatic contributions of knowledge on judges’ critical thinking on PA issues and its manifestations in legal practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Telma M. Marques & Isabel Narciso & Luana C. Ferreira, 2022. "How Do Family Court Judges Theorize about Parental Alienation? A Qualitative Exploration of the Territory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7555-:d:843668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marques, T.M. & Narciso, I. & Ferreira, L.C., 2020. "Empirical research on parental alienation: A descriptive literature review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7555-:d:843668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.