IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6435-d824014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Two-Phase, Joint-Commuting Model for Primary and Secondary Schools Considering Parking Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Huasheng Liu

    (College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

  • Yuqi Zhao

    (College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

  • Jin Li

    (College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

  • Yu Li

    (College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

  • Xiaowen Li

    (College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

  • Sha Yang

    (College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

Abstract

In light of the traffic congestion and traffic environment problems around schools that are caused by students commuting by car, this paper explores an efficient and feasible student commuting travel plan. Based on the ideas of “public–private cooperation” and “parking sharing”, combined with the characteristics of the family travel chain during the commuting period, a joint-commuting model of “private car and school bus” is creatively proposed. On the basis of considering the travel cost of parents and the operating cost of school bus, a two-phase commuting travel model for primary and secondary schools is proposed, and an algorithm is designed. The validity of the model is verified by an example and sensitivity analysis. The results show that the total time cost can be reduced by 23.33% when the private-car commuting mode is converted to the joint-commuting model. Among the results, we found that the driving time of a private car in the school commuting phase can be reduced by 23.36%, the dwell time can be reduced by 92.29%, and the driving time in the work and home phase can be reduced by 7.44%. Compared with the school-bus commuting mode, the school-bus time cost of joint commuting can be reduced by 54.88%. In addition, by analyzing the impact of various factors on the objective function and vehicle emissions, it can be seen that staggered commuting to school, regulating regional traffic volume, increasing parking spaces, and improving the utilization of parking spaces can effectively reduce the operating time cost of vehicles and exhaust emissions. The joint-commuting model proposed in this paper considers the balance between service level and resource consumption. While meeting the door-to-door travel needs of students, it can effectively reduce the travel costs of parents and school-bus operation costs, and it can alleviate traffic congestion around schools and reduce the impact on the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Huasheng Liu & Yuqi Zhao & Jin Li & Yu Li & Xiaowen Li & Sha Yang, 2022. "A Two-Phase, Joint-Commuting Model for Primary and Secondary Schools Considering Parking Sharing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6435-:d:824014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Byung-In & Kim, Seongbae & Park, Junhyuk, 2012. "A school bus scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 577-585.
    2. Park, Junhyuk & Tae, Hyunchul & Kim, Byung-In, 2012. "A post-improvement procedure for the mixed load school bus routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 204-213.
    3. M. Spada & M. Bierlaire & Th. M. Liebling, 2005. "Decision-Aiding Methodology for the School Bus Routing and Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 477-490, November.
    4. Sylvia Y. He & Genevieve Giuliano, 2017. "Factors affecting children’s journeys to school: a joint escort-mode choice model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 199-224, January.
    5. Billy E. Gillett & Leland R. Miller, 1974. "A Heuristic Algorithm for the Vehicle-Dispatch Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 340-349, April.
    6. Shafahi, Ali & Wang, Zhongxiang & Haghani, Ali, 2018. "SpeedRoute: Fast, efficient solutions for school bus routing problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 473-493.
    7. Amith Yarlagadda & Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan, 2008. "Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 201-218, March.
    8. Abhishek & Marko A. A. Boon & Michel Mandjes, 2019. "Generalized gap acceptance models for unsignalized intersections," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(3), pages 385-409, June.
    9. Hernan Caceres & Rajan Batta & Qing He, 2017. "School Bus Routing with Stochastic Demand and Duration Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1349-1364, November.
    10. Shangyao Yan & Fei-Yen Hsiao & Yi-Chun Chen, 2015. "Inter-School Bus Scheduling Under Stochastic Travel Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1049-1074, December.
    11. Schittekat, Patrick & Kinable, Joris & Sörensen, Kenneth & Sevaux, Marc & Spieksma, Frits & Springael, Johan, 2013. "A metaheuristic for the school bus routing problem with bus stop selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 518-528.
    12. Pollatschek, Moshe A. & Polus, Abishai & Livneh, Moshe, 2002. "A decision model for gap acceptance and capacity at intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 649-663, August.
    13. Joaquín Pacheco & Rafael Caballero & Manuel Laguna & Julián Molina, 2013. "Bi-Objective Bus Routing: An Application to School Buses in Rural Areas," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 397-411, August.
    14. A Corberán & E Fernández & M Laguna & R Martí, 2002. "Heuristic solutions to the problem of routing school buses with multiple objectives," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(4), pages 427-435, April.
    15. G. Clarke & J. W. Wright, 1964. "Scheduling of Vehicles from a Central Depot to a Number of Delivery Points," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 568-581, August.
    16. J Pacheco & R Martí, 2006. "Tabu search for a multi-objective routing problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(1), pages 29-37, January.
    17. Alireza Ermagun & Amir Samimi, 2018. "Mode choice and travel distance joint models in school trips," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1755-1781, November.
    18. Heidemann, Dirk & Wegmann, Helmut, 1997. "Queueing at unsignalized intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 239-263, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellegood, William A. & Solomon, Stanislaus & North, Jeremy & Campbell, James F., 2020. "School bus routing problem: Contemporary trends and research directions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Wang, Zhongxiang & Haghani, Ali, 2020. "Column generation-based stochastic school bell time and bus scheduling optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1087-1102.
    3. Shafahi, Ali & Wang, Zhongxiang & Haghani, Ali, 2018. "SpeedRoute: Fast, efficient solutions for school bus routing problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 473-493.
    4. Hernan Caceres & Rajan Batta & Qing He, 2017. "School Bus Routing with Stochastic Demand and Duration Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1349-1364, November.
    5. Fátima M. Souza Lima & Davi S. D. Pereira & Samuel V. Conceição & Ricardo S. Camargo, 2017. "A multi-objective capacitated rural school bus routing problem with heterogeneous fleet and mixed loads," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 359-386, December.
    6. Ansari, Azadeh & Farrokhvar, Leily & Kamali, Behrooz, 2021. "Integrated student to school assignment and school bus routing problem for special needs students," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.
    8. Xiaopan Chen & Yunfeng Kong & Lanxue Dang & Yane Hou & Xinyue Ye, 2015. "Exact and Metaheuristic Approaches for a Bi-Objective School Bus Scheduling Problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Shichao Sun & Zhengyu Duan & Qi Xu, 2018. "School bus routing problem in the stochastic and time-dependent transportation network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Banerjee, Dipayan & Smilowitz, Karen, 2019. "Incorporating equity into the school bus scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-246.
    11. Joaquín Pacheco & Rafael Caballero & Manuel Laguna & Julián Molina, 2013. "Bi-Objective Bus Routing: An Application to School Buses in Rural Areas," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 397-411, August.
    12. Dasdemir, Erdi & Testik, Murat Caner & Öztürk, Diclehan Tezcaner & Şakar, Ceren Tuncer & Güleryüz, Güldal & Testik, Özlem Müge, 2022. "A multi-objective open vehicle routing problem with overbooking: Exact and heuristic solution approaches for an employee transportation problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Ezquerro Eguizábal, Sara & Moura Berodia, José Luis & Ibeas Portilla, Ángel & Benavente Ponce, Juan, 2018. "Optimization model for school transportation design based on economic and social efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 93-101.
    14. Park, Junhyuk & Kim, Byung-In, 2010. "The school bus routing problem: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 311-319, April.
    15. Dias, Charitha & Abdullah, Muhammad & Lovreglio, Ruggiero & Sachchithanantham, Sumana & Rekatheeban, Markkandu & Sathyaprasad, I.M.S., 2022. "Exploring home-to-school trip mode choices in Kandy, Sri Lanka," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Saad AlQuhtani, 2023. "Factors Affecting Active Commuting to School in Sprawled Cities: The Case of Najran City, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Herminia I. Calvete & Carmen Galé & José A. Iranzo, 2022. "Approaching the Pareto Front in a Biobjective Bus Route Design Problem Dealing with Routing Cost and Individuals’ Walking Distance by Using a Novel Evolutionary Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, April.
    18. P. Matl & R. F. Hartl & T. Vidal, 2018. "Workload Equity in Vehicle Routing Problems: A Survey and Analysis," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 239-260, March.
    19. Gong, Manlin & Hu, Yucong & Chen, Zhiwei & Li, Xiaopeng, 2021. "Transfer-based customized modular bus system design with passenger-route assignment optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    20. Forma, Iris A. & Raviv, Tal & Tzur, Michal, 2015. "A 3-step math heuristic for the static repositioning problem in bike-sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 230-247.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6435-:d:824014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.