IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6050-d816786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Non)Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes in South African Parenting Magazines: How Marketing Regulations May Be Working

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Jewett

    (Division of Health & Society, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

  • Sukoluhle Pilime

    (Division of Health & Society, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

  • Linda Richter

    (DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

Abstract

Although exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first six months is optimal for child health, it remains low globally. Breastmilk substitutes (BMS) marketing undermines breastfeeding. In 2012, South Africa introduced Regulation 991, which prohibits marketing BMS products for infants below 6 months. Our study aimed to explore if and how BMS products were presented in South African parenting magazines post-R991. We applied a mixed-methods cross-sectional content analysis design, analyzing all 2018 issues of two popular parenting magazines. We descriptively analyzed quantitative codes, derived from an a priori framework, and conducted qualitative content analysis on a subset of texts and images. We found there was no overt marketing of BMS to parents with infants below 6 months. However, BMS advertisements were placed next to articles about young infants, and vague wording and images were ways by which BMS companies may indirectly benefit. Medical experts in both magazines promoted the introduction of solids before six months. To conclude, while BMS companies in South Africa were abiding by R991 by not overtly advertising BMS in parental print media, their influence persists. Continued monitoring of print media as well as other channels is advisable. This study may be of interest to countries considering stronger regulations of BMS advertising.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Jewett & Sukoluhle Pilime & Linda Richter, 2022. "(Non)Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes in South African Parenting Magazines: How Marketing Regulations May Be Working," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6050-:d:816786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Genevieve E Becker, 2020. "Marketing Breast feeding Substitutes: A Discussion Document," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genevieve E. Becker, 2021. "Measuring Mothers’ Viewpoints of Breast Pump Usage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6050-:d:816786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.