IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4717-d545590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between Social Integration and Face Mask Use Behavior during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Japan: Results from U-CORONA Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nobutoshi Nawa

    (Department of Medical Education Research and Development, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

  • Yui Yamaoka

    (Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

  • Yuna Koyama

    (Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

  • Hisaaki Nishimura

    (Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

  • Shiro Sonoda

    (Kuramochi Clinic Interpark, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-0114, Japan)

  • Jin Kuramochi

    (Kuramochi Clinic Interpark, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-0114, Japan)

  • Yasunari Miyazaki

    (Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

  • Takeo Fujiwara

    (Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan)

Abstract

Face mask use is a critical behavior to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to evaluate the association between social integration and face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic in a random sample of households in Utsunomiya City, Greater Tokyo, Japan. Data included 645 adults in the Utsunomiya COVID-19 seROprevalence Neighborhood Association (U-CORONA) study, which was conducted after the first wave of the pandemic, between 14 June 2020 and 5 July 2020, in Utsunomiya City. Social integration before the pandemic was assessed by counting the number of social roles, based on the Cohen’s social network index. Face mask use before and during the pandemic was assessed by questionnaire, and participants were categorized into consistent mask users, new users, and current non-users. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between lower social integration score and face mask use. To account for possible differential non-response bias, non-response weights were used. Of the 645 participants, 172 (26.7%) were consistent mask users and 460 (71.3%) were new users, while 13 (2.0%) were current non-users. Lower social integration level was positively associated with non-users (RRR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.82). Social integration may be important to promote face mask use.

Suggested Citation

  • Nobutoshi Nawa & Yui Yamaoka & Yuna Koyama & Hisaaki Nishimura & Shiro Sonoda & Jin Kuramochi & Yasunari Miyazaki & Takeo Fujiwara, 2021. "Association between Social Integration and Face Mask Use Behavior during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Japan: Results from U-CORONA Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4717-:d:545590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4717/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4717/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victoria S. Shelus & Simone C. Frank & Allison J. Lazard & Isabella C. A. Higgins & Marlyn Pulido & Ana Paula C. Richter & Sara M. Vandegrift & Rhyan N. Vereen & Kurt M. Ribisl & Marissa G. Hall, 2020. "Motivations and Barriers for the Use of Face Coverings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Messaging Insights from Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Onnela, Jukka-Pekka & Landon, Bruce E. & Kahn, Anna-Lea & Ahmed, Danish & Verma, Harish & O'Malley, A. James & Bahl, Sunil & Sutter, Roland W. & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2016. "Polio vaccine hesitancy in the networks and neighborhoods of Malegaon, India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 99-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ann Scheck McAlearney & Alice A. Gaughan & Sarah R. MacEwan & Megan E. Gregory & Laura J. Rush & Jaclyn Volney & Ashish R. Panchal, 2022. "Pandemic Experience of First Responders: Fear, Frustration, and Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Reich, Jennifer A., 2020. "“We are fierce, independent thinkers and intelligent”: Social capital and stigma management among mothers who refuse vaccines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Thomas H. Lee & Bobby Do & Levi Dantzinger & Joshua Holmes & Monique Chyba & Steven Hankins & Edward Mersereau & Kenneth Hara & Victoria Y. Fan, 2022. "Mitigation Planning and Policies Informed by COVID-19 Modeling: A Framework and Case Study of the State of Hawaii," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Trieste, Leopoldo & Geisler, Elie & Turchetti, Giuseppe, 2022. "Columbus' egg and the engineer's effect in forecasting solutions adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Wajdi Aljedaani & Eysha Saad & Furqan Rustam & Isabel de la Torre Díez & Imran Ashraf, 2022. "Role of Artificial Intelligence for Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination-Related Tweets: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-33, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4717-:d:545590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.