IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p4352-d539490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toxic Organic Contaminants in Airborne Particles: Levels, Potential Sources and Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Donatella Pomata

    (Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority via Roberto Ferruzzi 38, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Patrizia Di Filippo

    (Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority via Roberto Ferruzzi 38, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Carmela Riccardi

    (Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority via Roberto Ferruzzi 38, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Federica Castellani

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Giulia Simonetti

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Elisa Sonego

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesca Buiarelli

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

In the last years, many studies have focused on risk assessment of exposure of workers to airborne particulate matter (PM). Several studies indicate a strong correlation between PM and adverse health outcomes, as a function of particle size. In the last years, the study of atmospheric particulate matter has focused more on particles less than 10 μm or 2.5 μm in diameter; however, recent studies identify in particles less than 0.1 μm the main responsibility for negative cardiovascular effects. The present paper deals with the determination of 66 organic compounds belonging to six different classes of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the ultrafine, fine and coarse fractions of PM (PM < 0.1 µm; 0.1 < PM < 2.5 µm and 2.5 < PM < 10 µm) collected in three outdoor workplaces and in an urban outdoor area. Data obtained were analyzed with principal component analysis (PCA), in order to underline possible correlation between sites and classes of pollutants and characteristic emission sources. Emission source studies are, in fact, a valuable tool for both identifying the type of emission source and estimating the strength of each contamination source, as useful indicator of environment healthiness. Moreover, both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks were determined in order to estimate human health risk associated to study sites. Risk analysis was carried out evaluating the contribution of pollutant distribution in PM size fractions for all the sites. The results highlighted significant differences between the sites and specific sources of pollutants related to work activities were identified. In all the sites and for all the size fractions of PM both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk values were below acceptable and safe levels of risks recommended by the regulatory agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Donatella Pomata & Patrizia Di Filippo & Carmela Riccardi & Federica Castellani & Giulia Simonetti & Elisa Sonego & Francesca Buiarelli, 2021. "Toxic Organic Contaminants in Airborne Particles: Levels, Potential Sources and Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4352-:d:539490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giulia Simonetti & Patrizia Di Filippo & Carmela Riccardi & Donatella Pomata & Elisa Sonego & Francesca Buiarelli, 2020. "Occurrence of Halogenated Pollutants in Domestic and Occupational Indoor Dust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4352-:d:539490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.